Jump to content

General Election 2017


ender4

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Dr_Pangloss said:

Silly hypotheticals about nukes, people watch too many movies.

It's ridiculous, how **** complicated an issue is deciding whether or not to nuke someone - how could you give a throw away answer to a question like that?

Edited by a m ole
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OutByEaster? said:

In a world where our enemies are out there making bombs with pressure cookers, I think it's vital we have a nuclear deterrent to put them off.

 

A nuclear deterrent for nutters who make homemade bombs?

What are we going to do? Nuke their houses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dr_Pangloss said:

The nuke question sapped his momentum, an IRA questions could finish him off.

It was a load of nonsense too.

Why the hell would anyone fire a nuke first?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, StefanAVFC said:

It was a load of nonsense too.

Why the hell would anyone fire a nuke first?

Nuanced debate doesn't wash with the majority sadly. Will you use the bomb? Will you use the bomb? Say it, Say it!!

Edited by TheAuthority
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, StefanAVFC said:

It was a load of nonsense too.

Why the hell would anyone fire a nuke first?

It was more a loaded question to draw out his reluctance on Trident so the tea with terrorists ideal would come out.

I agree it's knocked him back a bit so he's now in Steve Bruce camp in your penalty area for final half hour gameplan now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â