striker Posted May 29, 2018 Visiting Supporter Share Posted May 29, 2018 2 hours ago, villarocker said: The first half tactics were disgraceful for such an occasion but, there's no denying the fact we should have been playing against 10 men for an hour, not 20 minutes! Decisions like that can win and lose you games. I believe we would have had Fredericks been sent off in the first half. While I accept your point on the difference between playing against 10 men for an hour rather than 20 minutes Villa played much better in the second half against eleven than they did 10 because Fulham were still going forward when they could which left them more open. When they went down to 10 they parked the bus and Villa really struggled to create anything which imo would have still happened if they’d been down to 10 for an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jareth Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 I have the feeling that on reflection the club will go with Bruce again. I presume he can make it work with less budget and that he will have to use the younger players. All it takes is the likes of grealish commiting, green back to fitness and one or two decent signings and hope springs eternal. If Bruce is confirmed then I’m sure there will be some disquiet but what can you do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thabucks Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 The FA have invested millions on St. George's Park to coach a new breed of tactically astute coaches and managers to replace and erase managers like Bruce from our game but let's gloss that fact over and live in the past and forget football moves on shall we. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Pangloss Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 9 minutes ago, Jareth said: I have the feeling that on reflection the club will go with Bruce again. I presume he can make it work with less budget and that he will have to use the younger players. All it takes is the likes of grealish commiting, green back to fitness and one or two decent signings and hope springs eternal. If Bruce is confirmed then I’m sure there will be some disquiet but what can you do. Same shit negative football that won't deliver, regardless of personale, no thanks. Xia is turning out to be a bit of disaster. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hippo Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 20 minutes ago, Jareth said: I have the feeling that on reflection the club will go with Bruce again. I presume he can make it work with less budget and that he will have to use the younger players. All it takes is the likes of grealish commiting, green back to fitness and one or two decent signings and hope springs eternal. If Bruce is confirmed then I’m sure there will be some disquiet but what can you do. I still think Bruce staying is the most likley outcome. If the reports on finances are accurate I just can not see past us selling Jack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holteend1982 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 32 minutes ago, Dr_Pangloss said: Same shit negative football that won't deliver, regardless of personale, no thanks. Xia is turning out to be a bit of disaster. Disaster? Think you might be over reacting a bit there! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eastie Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 47 minutes ago, striker said: While I accept your point on the difference between playing against 10 men for an hour rather than 20 minutes Villa played much better in the second half against eleven than they did 10 because Fulham were still going forward when they could which left them more open. When they went down to 10 they parked the bus and Villa really struggled to create anything which imo would have still happened if they’d been down to 10 for an hour. We played the best part of 80 mIns v 10 men against boro earlier in the season too - I agree there’s no guarantee we’d have broken them down . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post sne Posted May 29, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted May 29, 2018 Just went back and read the posts from last summer (around p 600 and forward) Think we might as well copy paste them into the thread and take the summer off. Nothing has changed and nothing will change with Bruce here. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob182 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 13 minutes ago, holteend1982 said: Disaster? Think you might be over reacting a bit there! Sunderland fans say hello Dr X has been far from a disaster. ‘Hit and miss’ maybe. ‘Naive’, probably. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holteend1982 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 21 minutes ago, Rob182 said: Sunderland fans say hello Dr X has been far from a disaster. ‘Hit and miss’ maybe. ‘Naive’, probably. Yes, dropping to league 1 now that's a proper disaster, I'd say Xia has only made 1 error and that was getting in Di Matteo from the start and letting him loose with all that money. I'd have also preferred him not to be telling the world we would be competing with Barcelona after 5 years either, it's year 3 and we are still playing the likes Bolton, Rotherham and Birmingham! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eastie Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 19 minutes ago, holteend1982 said: Yes, dropping to league 1 now that's a proper disaster, I'd say Xia has only made 1 error and that was getting in Di Matteo from the start and letting him loose with all that money. I'd have also preferred him not to be telling the world we would be competing with Barcelona after 5 years either, it's year 3 and we are still playing the likes Bolton, Rotherham and Birmingham! Possibly so but that error was huge and costly in the extreme - maybe had he given the money to someone better than rdm we wouldn’t be in this mess now . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davkaus Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 I think him still being in a job by this point suggests he's going nowhere. Xia's left the country. I'm sure Bruce has spoken with him and Wyness by now. If he was going to be sacked, it'd have happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRO Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 5 hours ago, villarocker said: The first half tactics were disgraceful for such an occasion but, there's no denying the fact we should have been playing against 10 men for an hour, not 20 minutes! Decisions like that can win and lose you games. I believe we would have had Fredericks been sent off in the first half. The first half was very disappointing VR....gleaning from Steve Bruces comments I am not so sure, it was planned that way.....He said he was disappointed that we were so negative. Now I get the notion that the players are not playing plan for whatever reason and thats his responsibility....but it doesn't sound like he was expecting it. Look, whatever the situation....He is the manager the book stops with him, I accept that but he has done some good things.....it would be more helpful in the critique if fans were more specific. Mt biggest gripe is....I think we should have signed a good leader of the line and a player comfortable with aerial balls.....I think he missed a trick there and IMO it cost him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vive_La_Villa Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 12 hours ago, VillanousOne said: Fat Sam. But seriously, we can't fear change or believe there are not other options out there, many other clubs have managed to get young English and foreign managers and do ok. Fat Sam has met his objective wherever he has gone. Wouldn’t be the worst appointment in the world. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eastie Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 41 minutes ago, Davkaus said: I think him still being in a job by this point suggests he's going nowhere. Xia's left the country. I'm sure Bruce has spoken with him and Wyness by now. If he was going to be sacked, it'd have happened. Just as easy to say if they were backing him to continue they’d have come out and said so by now - I’d expect things are going on behind the scenes as they pick the bones from this situation . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimlico_Villa Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 My view is that for those teams that narrowly miss out, if they can keep the core together and make some modifications, they usually go up the following season - just like Brighton. For this reason alone, I would keep Bruce - by doing so we maintain the culture, togetherness and discipline that he has installed. I just hope he realises that, under no circumstances, can you set out to draw a game and set his team out accordingly. Every single mode of play must be geared towards scoring a goal - that is the type of relentlessness that took Cardiff up this year. To be honest, I've often wondered this season whenever I have seen us sit deep and pass sideways and backwards - even when not in a winning position - whether this is Bruce's tactics or the fact that older players will always play the easy ball rather than the ambitious one. Perhaps a good infusion of youth - O'hare and Green in particular - will fix this. I'd like to see Terry stay but would be more sensible to have him in a coaching capacity; that way, we can keep his influence around the club but not have to pay him huge wages. If we are to bring youth through, it would be hugely beneficial to have Terry looking after them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briny_ear Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 4 hours ago, DCJonah said: Terry's comments add to the need to move on from Bruce. That game plan was terrible. That’s a different point of course. You claimed they had no game plan. Now it just seems you didn’t like the game plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob182 Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 4 minutes ago, TRO said: The first half was very disappointing VR....gleaning from Steve Bruces comments I am not so sure, it was planned that way.....He said he was disappointed that we were so negative. Now I get the notion that the players are not playing plan for whatever reason and thats his responsibility....but it doesn't sound like he was expecting it. TRO, you’re a good poster on here, but I think your support of Bruce sometimes clouds your judgement. How many times this season has Bruce come out and said that he wasn’t happy with how we played in either the whole game or one of the halves? It’s happened a LOT. It can’t always be that the players aren’t following his instructions. It seems quite obvious to me that we set up to defend and try to break on the counter. In a final, against a team that, man-for-man, we should be able to match, that was poor from Bruce. We’ve seen it all season, he only seems to want to play fully on the front foot when we NEED to. Reactive, not proactive. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hippo Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 4 minutes ago, Pimlico_Villa said: My view is that for those teams that narrowly miss out, if they can keep the core together and make some modifications, they usually go up the following season - just like Brighton. For this reason alone, I would keep Bruce - by doing so we maintain the culture, togetherness and discipline that he has installed. I just hope he realises that, under no circumstances, can you set out to draw a game and set his team out accordingly. Every single mode of play must be geared towards scoring a goal - that is the type of relentlessness that took Cardiff up this year. To be honest, I've often wondered this season whenever I have seen us sit deep and pass sideways and backwards - even when not in a winning position - whether this is Bruce's tactics or the fact that older players will always play the easy ball rather than the ambitious one. Perhaps a good infusion of youth - O'hare and Green in particular - will fix this. I'd like to see Terry stay but would be more sensible to have him in a coaching capacity; that way, we can keep his influence around the club but not have to pay him huge wages. If we are to bring youth through, it would be hugely beneficial to have Terry looking after them. Thats the dilemma we can't keep the current squad together. Spoke to the ticket office this morning, I tried to get info - she told me she would probably be the last to know anything - but she wasn't aware of anything drastic happening soon. Sounds like he is staying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRO Posted May 29, 2018 Share Posted May 29, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, AntrimBlack said: That will be the Steve Bruce luvvies, more overpaid, underworked veterans. You really make too much play on if's and but's - immaterial. The discussion needs to move on to what actually happened during his tenure. If life was all just black and white, you would be right, but it's not. We never got promotion fact, so he never acheived the objective fact......so what now dismantle the whole thing and start again....Have you any idea how much work that could entail, not to mention the money, that we haven't got. It seems most fans want to keep Jack Grealish....If SB goes, the new man will want money, the likelyhood that Jack has to sold. I am not for sacking him, because i think we came so close and i do not want to see all the good work over the last 18 months undone....but I recognise there is a mood for change....If SB cannot recognise a mood for change , then I will find it difficult to support him....but I still fear the worst, if he goes. I think Steve Bruce going all hinges on who the prospective replacement could be....that is the 64 million dollar question. Edited May 29, 2018 by TRO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts