It's Your Round Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 15 minutes ago, DCJonah said: Yep i decided to look. Really sad to see. It’s awful. The Daily Mail running with the terrible “Take back control” headline, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 1 hour ago, DCJonah said: Seriously what the **** has happened to us? I'm 40 years old and I've never known it like this. If I didn't have lots of family here, I'd seriously look at **** off elsewhere. I'm starting to despise this country. Same here, I’d still consider upping and leaving with my wife and kids if a good opportunity came by. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted April 14, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted April 14, 2022 1 hour ago, Chindie said: The Rwanda detention programme also will cost in excess of a billion. **** grim. A billion a year... I believe 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted April 14, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted April 14, 2022 1 hour ago, StefanAVFC said: What is it actually about? If it's the financial burden of these crossings, then it would literally be cheaper to house them in a luxury hotel in Central London so... Why not go the full hog and just execute them if it's truly about pure evil. It's about convincing the gammons that vote for them that they're being hard on immigration. I imagine staying in power is worth easily more to them than the billion a year it will cost. They couldn't give a **** if it makes sense or if it's value for money. Their voters will eat it up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 Tamworth MP and massive brown noser surprises nobody. Who is he kidding that most people want him to get on with his job? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chindie Posted April 14, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted April 14, 2022 12 minutes ago, Stevo985 said: A billion a year... I believe A billion a year to rub our heels on the faces of brown people on foreign soil = good deal, vote winner. A billion a year to help the worst off in this country = **** you woke libs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkyvilla Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 What a bunch of words removed. Our very own Madagascar Plan. I genuinely couldn't believe my eyes when I saw the headline earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 18 minutes ago, Stevo985 said: It's about convincing the gammons that vote for them that they're being hard on immigration. I imagine staying in power is worth easily more to them than the billion a year it will cost. They couldn't give a **** if it makes sense or if it's value for money. Their voters will eat it up I'm aware of that. Just absolutely mental, that we hear so much about how much immigrants cost (despite them being a net positive) and how we should look after our own, yet now we will be spending 1b a year to deport immigrants to **** Rwanda; 1b that could be spent looking after our own. words removed. All of them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 Exactly, they try to disguise their racism by trying to convey that their issue with asylum seekers is the cost to the taxpayer. Suddenly they're lauding a policy that is going to cost far far more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 Most importantly though, how is this going to affect Arsenal's sponsorship deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted April 14, 2022 Moderator Share Posted April 14, 2022 12 minutes ago, Wainy316 said: Exactly, they try to disguise their racism by trying to convey that their issue with asylum seekers is the cost to the taxpayer. Suddenly they're lauding a policy that is going to cost far far more. This is only for single males, the group of refugees that would be the lowest cost to the taxpayer, it makes zero sense on a cost basis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 We’ll hear soon that the government have already spent £250m on this ridiculous plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bannedfromHandV Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 1 minute ago, Genie said: We’ll hear soon that the government have already given their mates £250m on this ridiculous plan. FTFY 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seat68 Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 What do Rwanda get out of this. Aside from money from us, my assumption would be they then have to support the person for as long as they are in Rwanda and can't support themselves. Why Rwanda??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 1 minute ago, Seat68 said: What do Rwanda get out of this. Aside from money from us, my assumption would be they then have to support the person for as long as they are in Rwanda and can't support themselves. Why Rwanda??? Everyone else said no. Wouldnt it be cheaper and better to offer these single males training in areas we have shortages like HGV driving and trades etc? Surely that’s the everybody wins scenario? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straggler Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 Please note that the people they are sending to Rwanda are asylum seekers not immigrants. There is a big difference and it does not make things better. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chindie Posted April 14, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted April 14, 2022 3 minutes ago, Genie said: Everyone else said no. Wouldnt it be cheaper and better to offer these single males training in areas we have shortages like HGV driving and trades etc? Surely that’s the everybody wins scenario? No. They're foreigners. They must pay for their temerity to think they can come here. A Rwandan camp is almost too good for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomav84 Posted April 14, 2022 VT Supporter Share Posted April 14, 2022 tempted to throw into the twittersphere something along the lines of "that £1.4bn could've been used to house homeless veterans". suddenly that's no longer a problem now is it now that we have a way of getting all those brown faces off our shores. perhaps said homeless veterans that are apparently all over the place could also be sheltered in Rwanda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted April 14, 2022 Share Posted April 14, 2022 2 hours ago, Ingram85 said: Again, what do the resident VT Tory voters think about everything going on at the moment? You’ve not picked a great time to ask that question, they’re all on their way to their holiday homes to boost local economies with sales of red wine and disposable bbq trays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts