sharkyvilla Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Just seen an article saying Jill Dando was murdered to keep her from shopping a paedo ring at the BBC...I wonder if there's any substance to that? Its been rumoured for a while. The Guardian has an article saying that two different well respected former newspaper editors have claimed they were slapped with D notices in the 80's when they were going to expose Cyril Smith. The MOD claims there is no evidence for this. Cover up looking more and more likely Thought it was a tennis loving pop star that killed her according to the interweb LOL I just googled that. I love the Internet sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drat01 Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Just seen an article saying Jill Dando was murdered to keep her from shopping a paedo ring at the BBC...I wonder if there's any substance to that? Shopping for a Beano ring on the BBC? - do QVC sell them? am I confused? and why would Bobby Davro want one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mockingbird_franklin Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Why would they cover up paedophilia by mp's? 14 seconds in Well yes but I think the cover up here goes well beyond the scope of the position of Chief Whip Oh i totally agree, and i would suggest the cover up by other persons could easily be for similar reasons, Of course taking part in a cover up also leaves you very vulnerable to manipulation yourself, But it is the bland and cold way the matter of possible pedophilia is presented that is also very worrying 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterms Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Child sex abuse debated in Parliament: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blandy Posted November 27, 2014 Moderator Share Posted November 27, 2014 I guess that pic, which shows only 10 or so MPs present might be taken as shameful "lack of interest", though I'm not sure it does show that. What exactly is to be gained by more being there? Are they going to solve anything, if there are more there to "debate the progress"? The enquiry (due to the incompetence of Theresa May) hasn't even got a chairperson. It can't really be making much progress, can it? It's almsot like the whole thing is being shuffled to the right (of a timeline). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterms Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 What is to be gained by there being more of them present? For many debates, nothing at all. If there are three or four people who understand the issues and press them, if the HoC effectively acts as a committee, exploring, testing, scrutinising, I'm happy with that. In this case, there is a national scandal involving paedophile rings which include MPs and other establishment figures, which have deliberately been ignored for decades, where evidence has been suppressed and destroyed, where witnesses have been intimidated and in some cases killed, and where the concealers of truth feel so confident in their untouchability that one of them feels able to warn off another MP by a private word in the Lobby. In this case, yes, I do expect more than a token presence. I expect a thoroughgoing investigation, pressed hard by all parties, with their determination underlined by the simple fact of showing that they can be prepared even to drag their flabby arses out of the subsidised bars to hear the debate, and preferably also meet and listen to and reflect the concerns of the victims. Perhaps I ask too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mockingbird_franklin Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 The only people who wouldn't want institutionalised pedophilia stopped and wouldn't actively pursue such a course are those actively involved in it, or those either actively or passively covering it up, maybe everyone should ask their MP their stance on the matter, and what they have done and propose to do to help bring it out in the open so those guilty of either participating or covering up can be exposed whilst still alive and brought to justice and account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterms Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 Interesting claim here - hasn't yet evidenced it as far as I can see. Don Hale OBE @perryscope21 · 2h 2 hours ago Whips tell MPs not to attend paedo debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mockingbird_franklin Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 I believe the biggest mistake one can make when considering organsised pedophilia rings within government and other institutions is to let yourself be sold the agenda they keep pushing, that it is in the past Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omariqy Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 Christian Grooming Gang. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mockingbird_franklin Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 Christian Grooming Gang. You could put it that way, but I don't think much grooming goes on, just forced systematic abuse, grooming suggests a process of coercion so the victim becomes a 'willing' participant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omariqy Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 It was tongue in cheek. The whole thing stinks though and it does not surprise me. I wouldn't be surprised if it's still going on and some top name MPs are involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mockingbird_franklin Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 It was tongue in cheek. The whole thing stinks though and it does not surprise me. I wouldn't be surprised if it's still going on and some top name MPs are involved. I did grasp it was tongue in cheek, hence my like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omariqy Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 Ah right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterms Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Twitter: Couple of big stories involving child abuse in tomorrow's papers Star & the People will be focusing on links to Westminster paedophile rings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterms Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Torygraph Scotland Yard detective 'removed from paedophile probe after naming politicians' The former top officer claimed he suddenly found himself taken off the case and put on a disciplinary after revealing politicians were among the suspects... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterms Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 John Mann: Been waiting for confirmation of big child abuse development. Have it now. Then Clive Driscoll and Don Hale reveal more. Rewrite underway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xann Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 SNP activist 'killed over child sex files'... A FIREBRAND SNP activist who died in mysterious circumstances was to expose a paedophile ring that would have brought down the Government, it was claimed last night. Express Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted January 2, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted January 2, 2015 Royal family now dragged in to allegations. See BBC news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeVillan Posted January 2, 2015 Share Posted January 2, 2015 You know when you're on the weird side of YouTube where people claim that leaders are abusing and sacrificing children, and you just laugh cause you think it's bullshit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts