Jump to content

Things you often Wonder


mjmooney

Recommended Posts

You know how men love lesbian porn, I wonder if women feel the same about gay porn, like if they enjoy seeing Larry shove his rod up Ben's arse.

Article I read on Flipboard the other day said straight women seem to be watching Lesbian porn in high numbers ... Article suggested that a lot of women harbour secret desires with another woman , presumably not the dungaree wearing feminist green voting ones
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to make a completely ignorant guess and say no because the circuit is not complete. But then I'm no electrolologist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the ohms are relayed back to the first circuit then it should be that current stops the electricity being used

 

but I don't know if that's the same in 240 volt households running separate ring mains

 

might be worth checking with an amp meter when you've next got to install a breaker into the main board 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Half reading through this, and getting two post threads mixed up, for a moment I thought someone had put a light bulb up their bum, and it had exploded!  :o

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In fact it is called the theory of evolution and the theory of big bang specifically because they are theories - not facts.

There is no point in debating someone who can get such a fundamental statement wrong.

 

Please read up on the "theory" of gravity. Or read down. Apparently it's not a fact if it's a theory.

 

 big bang relies upon gravity being the central underpinning force of the universe

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Gravity isn't a force it's local distortion in spacetime caused by the interaction of particles in a Higgs field. Gravity is both a fact and a theory. Same as evolution.

 

Your logical fallacies are showing. Time for some prescience. I'll link to peer reviewed papers with definitive conclusions accepted by the scientific consensus and you'll link to various apologist and creationist self-aggrandisement web blogs.

 

Of course, if you have something new, then that's what the religion thread is for, but please don't just repeat the same old rubbish from the same old web sites. All your examples have been debunked many times, even on this website.

 

Thanks

 

Well I didn't actually say gravity is a force - I think I said big bang relies on a upon gravity being a force.  I mean you could even read my posts that you wanna shout down and see that I said gravity isn't a force. You could get into differences between electro-magnetism and Higgs fields but whatever - which year there are loads of peer reviewed journals I could reference for this. Okay in one instance you could kinda be super pedantic and really nail the use of the word force but to argue semantics on that would be churlish to say the least.

 

Not entirely sure where I kind of stated anything as a particular fact or ontological position - so as to debunking anything I am not really sure anything I said is debunkable as I think I was speculating on possibilities not hardline deep rooted positions. I think if you read the words I wroted with a similar level of critical thinking you applied to the use of the word force you would see this. I mean I presume you read peer reviewed scientific journals so I guess you can see this. Or you could answer some of the questions I asked which would like ... you know help me to 'learn' or expand my consciousness or whatever. Or you could just call something horseshit. I mean if you see something you don't like then you could just shout it down. Or you could like, you know, chat about it and have some kind of reasonable discussion. However much you disagree with something that's still the reasonable position to take. Maybe I was a bit rude to you? Sorry if so.  

 

The whole point of debating is presumably not to 'have an argument' but to kinda you know learn form the person you are debating with? I would say there is not point debating with someone who won't listen to your side of the debate and ignore your questions and focus on an stance won't move from. You can read all the scientific peer reviewed journals you want but you won't find much wisdom there - lots of knowledge maybe.

 

I have just googled scientific fact for a definition and taken the first one I saw. Any observation repeatedly confirmed and accepted as true. I am not entirely sure that macro evolution or big bang fulfil this definition. Micro evolution - yeah you can call that a fact if you want. That is why it is important to differentiate. I take it you disagree - and also that you don't want to continue this convo.

 

Appreciate your point about the location and tangent this was taken but kinda wanted to reply to the flow. Can consider it closed from my point of view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You know how men love lesbian porn, I wonder if women feel the same about gay porn, like if they enjoy seeing Larry shove his rod up Ben's arse.

Article I read on Flipboard the other day said straight women seem to be watching Lesbian porn in high numbers ... Article suggested that a lot of women harbour secret desires with another woman , presumably not the dungaree wearing feminist green voting ones

 

I know a woman who used to babysit for us years back, she loved bi-sexual porn, usually with one woman and two dudes all **** each other

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

You know how men love lesbian porn, I wonder if women feel the same about gay porn, like if they enjoy seeing Larry shove his rod up Ben's arse.

Article I read on Flipboard the other day said straight women seem to be watching Lesbian porn in high numbers ... Article suggested that a lot of women harbour secret desires with another woman , presumably not the dungaree wearing feminist green voting ones

 

I know a woman who used to babysit for us years back, she loved bi-sexual porn, usually with one woman and two dudes all **** each other

 

 

Wonderful...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the ohms are relayed back to the first circuit then it should be that current stops the electricity being used

 

but I don't know if that's the same in 240 volt households running separate ring mains

 

might be worth checking with an amp meter when you've next got to install a breaker into the main board

I'm curious, but I'm also lazy. I'll settle for "probably not" :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

if the ohms are relayed back to the first circuit then it should be that current stops the electricity being used

 

but I don't know if that's the same in 240 volt households running separate ring mains

 

might be worth checking with an amp meter when you've next got to install a breaker into the main board

I'm curious, but I'm also lazy. I'll settle for "probably not" :)

 

 

...dzzzzzzt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...
Â