StefanAVFC Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 Not even a parody account 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted February 8 Moderator Share Posted February 8 The absolutely shameless word removed has announced it's all Starmer's fault... Quote Rishi Sunak has accused Sir Keir Starmer of demonstrating "the worst of politics" for "using the tragedy" of Brianna Ghey in a House of Commons row. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68237826 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davkaus Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 16 minutes ago, ml1dch said: To be fair to him (which I don't like doing, because he's a prick), "himself" in that interview is referring to Sunak. Earlier he refers to Briana as she. Yeah, I think you're absolutely right. It's poorly worded and ambiguous, but I think that's all it is, I didn't catch that interpretation initially but since it's been pointed out, I think that's the first one and explains why he seems just stuck processing her response, he's got no idea what she's going on about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seat68 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 So far right mouthpiece, GB News. Never one to pretend there is any balance on their screens, Jacob Rees Mogg is having a bit of a break from his programme on the channel, who is taking over and doing a Q and A, Rishi Sunak. An expanded question and answer session with the completely normal GB News viewers. Not sure if this is before or after the by elections, and if this is some pre-emptive plea to the MPs not to send letters to the 1922 committee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Follyfoot Posted February 9 VT Supporter Share Posted February 9 6 minutes ago, Seat68 said: So far right mouthpiece, GB News. Never one to pretend there is any balance on their screens, Jacob Rees Mogg is having a bit of a break from his programme on the channel, who is taking over and doing a Q and A, Rishi Sunak. An expanded question and answer session with the completely normal GB News viewers. Not sure if this is before or after the by elections, and if this is some pre-emptive plea to the MPs not to send letters to the 1922 committee. Will miss the Moggster 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seat68 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 2 minutes ago, Follyfoot said: Will miss the Moggster You need to get your sights looked at then, or practice more with your weapon. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Follyfoot Posted February 9 VT Supporter Share Posted February 9 1 minute ago, Seat68 said: You need to get your sights looked at then, or practice more with your weapon. I just find him hilarious, he is so posh and entitled and sneery and the way his son is a caricature of him and of course Nanny. A national treasure 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Designer1 Posted February 9 VT Supporter Popular Post Share Posted February 9 6 minutes ago, Follyfoot said: I just find him hilarious, he is so posh and entitled and sneery and the way his son is a caricature of him and of course Nanny. A national treasure He's a word removed. He's not a 'hilarious' word removed. He's just a word removed. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Follyfoot Posted February 9 VT Supporter Share Posted February 9 4 minutes ago, Designer1 said: He's a word removed. He's not a 'hilarious' word removed. He's just a word removed. Puts glasses to end of nose and sneers at @Designer1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Meritious salutations fellow camp comedy fascists, nannus titus still sucubus. Absolute wrong ‘un, god knows what they’d find if the police seized his quill and parchment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meregreen Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Sunak criticising local councils for wanting to raise council tax above the mandatory 5% limit, in order to stave off crippling cuts to council services. This is the leader of a Party that has cut the central govt. grant to local authorities by 40% since 2010. They’ll happily offload responsibilities to local govt. that used to be funded direct from Whitehall, then starve those authorities of the money needed to support those things. Duplicitous bastards. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villan95 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 1 hour ago, Follyfoot said: Will miss the Moggster Ahh saw this and thought he was leaving parliament. Shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meregreen Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 (edited) 2 minutes ago, villan95 said: Ahh saw this and thought he was leaving parliament. Shame. Hopefully he will be, soon. Edited February 9 by meregreen 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villan95 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Just now, meregreen said: Hopefully he will be soon. Yep his seat isn't completely safe anymore is it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 9 minutes ago, meregreen said: Sunak criticising local councils for wanting to raise council tax above the mandatory 5% limit, in order to stave off crippling cuts to council services. This is the leader of a Party that has cut the central govt. grant to local authorities by 40% since 2010. They’ll happily offload responsibilities to local govt. that used to be funded direct from Whitehall, then starve those authorities of the money needed to support those things. Duplicitous bastards. Thing is, they’ve basically found a back door route to fulfilling tory ideology. A smaller state, less ‘interference’. You can have an ideological debate on libraries, recycling, child care, street lighting, sure start, council information hubs, drug rehab and all of that. Or you can just switch off the funding and get a smaller state by strangulation. Then, when the council tries to compensate, tell the people the council is shit and charging them more. There’s nothing annoyingly myopic about it, it’s ideology. It’s an attempt to carry on the curse of old droopy face, if ain’t directly immediately benefitting rich folk, close it down. The greedy love it, the thick fall for it. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villan95 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 2 by-elections today then. Only a matter of time until we find out who the new 'representative for Wellingborough' is 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villan95 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 Labour odds on to take both Wellingborough and Kingswood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Genie Posted February 15 Popular Post Share Posted February 15 7 minutes ago, villan95 said: Labour odds on to take both Wellingborough and Kingswood. and Tories to say they are both shit and they didn’t want them anyway 1 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKP90 Posted February 16 VT Supporter Share Posted February 16 2 hours ago, villan95 said: 2 by-elections today then. Only a matter of time until we find out who the new 'representative for Wellingborough' is Oh, man. I came on here just to make a representative for Wellingborough joke. Already done. Denied. Oh well, I'll have to wait until there is a news story about how NASA are renovating old rusty rockets. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkyvilla Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Kingswood gone already with a 16 point swing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts