RichardCanning

Only problem with this story is the guy got one of the results wrong, he predicted Cena to beat Ryback first time out and it was ruled a no contest. Which means that if someone was betting on them he didn't win unless he was putting them on as single bets. Apparently WWE now know about it and is taking steps to address the situation.

Is the correct answer and additionally I believe they'll be closer to the top 4 than Spurs this season

Benteke is looking for Champions League football, Spurs don't offer that. They like to think they do in a similar vein to them liking to think they are a top club. If Benteke is leaving for the premiership outside of the Champions League I think Liverpool after Suarez departs is more likely than Spurs.

Has no-one noticed that number 49 (Delph?) is wearing a bra?

It's Friday so lets have a bit of fun, shamelessly stolen from reddit. If you were to die now and they put your last text message sent on your tombstone what would it say: "Just waiting on results then will be there" is mine, which would suggest the results weren't great....

Oasis - Wonderwall

Wilder v Chisora is off as Wilder can't travel. Means Fury may step in to face Chisora in July

Maybe deserving of it's own thread as we have actually been confirmed as making contact: http://www.torquayunited.com/news/article/prynn-talks-832024.aspx'>Torquay Striker Liam Prynn Would appear that Lambert and team are doing their research at all levels!

Oddschecker.com is your friend

Bad news is that if Wigan beat Arsenal, Spurs will only need a point against Sunderland which will suit both sides. If Wigan win on Tuesday the shit really hitteth the fan

If Chelsea beat Spurs midweek they will need a point to guarantee a Champions League place. RE Villa v Chelsea: When both teams need a draw, a draw is normally the result

Clive James

Carrodus scored the own goal

Dentist - no treatment. Winner

21:45 which means 22:00

How about Hoddle? :winkold:

He really is **** magic. Could it be possible that Randy completely mismanaged him by saying he could have everything because he clearly is proving at Sunderland he's not a chequebook manager

Here's a tension sheet for you to patent and keep working on the Omm song

You do realise Bridge is only on loan till the end of the season therefore is unlikely to have seen any change in his wages with Citeh still picking up some/the majority according to some media outlets of the weekly bill? The only raise Bridge will see is if he has an appearance bonus whereby he'll get the money for that

Thing is he always gets them playing for him. Even with the crap he has signed I bet Sunderland finish above Villa this season

Hold your horses right there! If it is a loan there is tax to be paid for Redknapp to claim he didn't know this was the case is a little licentious as he fills out a tax return/should have been informing his accountant of the monies as failure to do so will cause him problems! The reason the loan is taxable is because it is a benefit in kind from an employer meaning tax equivalent to the value of the interest for the period borrowed for should be paid by Redknapp (hence why Mandaric is trying to claim it is nothing to do with any bonuses Redknapp is owed, a story that is a little thin on the ground when MM was employing HR at the time). If (and as I think is the case in this instance) the loan wasn't repaid then tax is due on the whole amount. This is tantamount to tax evasion hence there is a wrongdoing and Redknapp needs to be punished accordingly. If you think this is just going to be in the form of a lecture/small fine, I think you are mistaken, it is likely to be a 6 figure fine IMO.

Brendan Rogers, sadly he isn't on your list and won't be given the job. I'd like to see McLeish given it to get him out of Villa or alternatively Redknapp

From the evidence it seems Mandaric paid Redknapp a sum of money into a Monaco bank account. He is claiming to have done this as a friend either as a loan or a gift and outside of his employment of Redknapp. Unfortunately the sum of money involved is not inconsequential and as it was from an employer needs to be taxed. Redknapp will get a hefty fine and community service IMO. Unlike some people who seem to know the people involved's exact thoughts, I haven't a clue whether this was done on purpose and nor can the jury so would expect them to go with the verdict that there is a wrongdoing but it cannot be deemed deliberate and sentence accordingly.

Aren't there several thousand professional poker players the world over?

Raw was Jericho last night as I said on a previous page