Daniel Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 That is harsh, if he'd done Ivanovic some serious harm you could understand it, you wouldn't get that for trying to deliberately break someones leg on the pitch. It's not the point though. If you make a bad tackle, most of the time it's a pure accident. He has intentionally tried to harm someone. Not acceptable and 10 games is totally fair given his previous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted April 24, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted April 24, 2013 The most overwhelmingly frequent argument on there seems to be "it didn't leave a mark" As if that matters 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islingtonclaret Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 This is all very, very funny. He tried to bite someone, he got punished for it. OR THE FA IS RACIST AND HAS AN AGENDA AGAINST LIVERPOOL FC. I know which one I believe. There are some players that bring out the best of the mad scousers, and this one is right up there. Funny, when Fellani is being a naughty boy Moyes says "It's out of order. I'll discipline him". Everton must be pissing themselves... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Although it is right that they have thrown the book at him I think it is stupid that Defoe only got a yellow card for the same offence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingram85 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 "We need to properly go to war with the FA over this. We've been used, time and time again by those aging, incompetent, racist, scouse hating c*nts. Enough. No **** more." - Red_Isle_Chap **** me they really are a bunch of scouse word removed's arent they. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I'd guess the majority on RAWK are not scousers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimzk5 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Although it is right that they have thrown the book at him I think it is stupid that Defoe only got a yellow card for the same offence. Quite right. The can't punish if the ref saw it rule is ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 See ya, Rat Boy I really hope Liverpool ship him off this summer, he's a blight on English football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingram85 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I'd guess the majority on RAWK are not scousers. Scouse by association Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Suarez is a clear victim of Dental Profiling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dodgyknees Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 That site makes me feel more comfortable to visit VT, it makes us seem sane. (somebody who loves very small shit Scottish players might fit in on there though) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avfc96 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Going to set myself a account up on RAWK. This is going to be funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 10 games is not just for the bite though is it. It's factoring in his previous offenses too. 6 or 7 for the bite. 3or 4 for the fact he's a cheating racist word removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 That is harsh, if he'd done Ivanovic some serious harm you could understand it, you wouldn't get that for trying to deliberately break someones leg on the pitch. It's not the point though. If you make a bad tackle, most of the time it's a pure accident. He has intentionally tried to harm someone. Not acceptable and 10 games is totally fair given his previous. Agreed. If this happened outside the stadium, he'd be charged with assault and battery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulC Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 That is harsh, if he'd done Ivanovic some serious harm you could understand it, you wouldn't get that for trying to deliberately break someones leg on the pitch. It's not the point though. If you make a bad tackle, most of the time it's a pure accident. He has intentionally tried to harm someone. Not acceptable and 10 games is totally fair given his previous. I don't really agree because a wreckless challenge like we saw from mcmanaman could have ended the guys career, and that went unpunished. Wheras the Suarez so-called bite didn't even break skin because if there had of been a serious mark there the ref would have show him the red card. So obviously there was no real intent to hurt the guy but it was a stupid thing to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 He was showing something to the officials so I assume it had marked him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dodgyknees Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 That is harsh, if he'd done Ivanovic some serious harm you could understand it, you wouldn't get that for trying to deliberately break someones leg on the pitch. It's not the point though. If you make a bad tackle, most of the time it's a pure accident. He has intentionally tried to harm someone. Not acceptable and 10 games is totally fair given his previous. I don't really agree because a wreckless challenge like we saw from mcmanaman could have ended the guys career, and that went unpunished. Wheras the Suarez so-called bite didn't even break skin because if there had of been a serious mark there the ref would have show him the red card. So obviously there was no real intent to hurt the guy but it was a stupid thing to do. The McManaman tackle was seen by the officials, there-for no punishment could have been taken after the game. The Suarez incident was not seen, there-for, punishment could be taken. ^ The FA Rules, same for all players, teams etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CI Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 RAWK "Stunned, just...stunned! The club needs to fight this all the way now, make some **** noise this time! The English FA is the laughing stock of the whole football world, so random, headless and stuck in the past it's beyond rediculous" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papillon Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 That is harsh, if he'd done Ivanovic some serious harm you could understand it, you wouldn't get that for trying to deliberately break someones leg on the pitch. It's not the point though. If you make a bad tackle, most of the time it's a pure accident. He has intentionally tried to harm someone. Not acceptable and 10 games is totally fair given his previous. I don't really agree because a wreckless challenge like we saw from mcmanaman could have ended the guys career, and that went unpunished. Wheras the Suarez so-called bite didn't even break skin because if there had of been a serious mark there the ref would have show him the red card. So obviously there was no real intent to hurt the guy but it was a stupid thing to do. Seriously, this has got nothing to do with anything. Tackling is part of the game, even a tackle that is not even a free-kick can break a leg and ruin a career so to speak. A revengeful tackle a la Keane and Joey Barton is something different, the tackle from McManaman is incredibly bad but it is also part of the game. Tackling IS allowed, if you do it badly you get a red card and 3 games out - thus the system has red cards and suspensions. I would say nothing if McManaman had gotten 6 games for that tackle, but the system is flawed as we all know. Biting is not part of the game, that's for dogs and other animals. It's impossible to explain why a player bites another player without being tackled badly or kicked in the nuts first, where some mild form of explanation would have been present. It's the lowest form of treatment for another human-being alongside spitting and that is why it should be punished severely. People are also mentioning the fact that Suarez got less games for his racist comments towards Patrice Evra. I think there is an important distinction; namely that Suarez is not admitted racist, he merely used offensive words to cause effect (like most people on here do every single day when they think about it). He does not have anything against Evra's color, but he knew Evra would be put off by it. I think biting a guy is much lower than saying bad words to another and deserves exactly the ban he got. Question though; will he get 10 games + 2 for the ten yellow cards he has collected in the Prem this season? Which means 12 games? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papillon Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 That is harsh, if he'd done Ivanovic some serious harm you could understand it, you wouldn't get that for trying to deliberately break someones leg on the pitch. It's not the point though. If you make a bad tackle, most of the time it's a pure accident. He has intentionally tried to harm someone. Not acceptable and 10 games is totally fair given his previous. I don't really agree because a wreckless challenge like we saw from mcmanaman could have ended the guys career, and that went unpunished. Wheras the Suarez so-called bite didn't even break skin because if there had of been a serious mark there the ref would have show him the red card. So obviously there was no real intent to hurt the guy but it was a stupid thing to do. Seriously, this has got nothing to do with anything. No intent to hurt the guy? What? He BITES him! You call it a so-called bite as well, he practically locks in like a badger, even twice after missing the first attempt. Tackling is part of the game, even a tackle that is not even a free-kick can break a leg and ruin a career so to speak. A revengeful tackle a la Keane and Joey Barton is something different, the tackle from McManaman is incredibly bad but it is also part of the game. Tackling IS allowed, if you do it badly you get a red card and 3 games out - thus the system has red cards and suspensions. I would say nothing if McManaman had gotten 6 games for that tackle, but the system is flawed as we all know. Biting is not part of the game, that's for dogs and other animals. It's impossible to explain why a player bites another player without being tackled badly or kicked in the nuts first, where some mild form of explanation would have been present. It's the lowest form of treatment for another human-being alongside spitting and that is why it should be punished severely. People are also mentioning the fact that Suarez got less games for his racist comments towards Patrice Evra. I think there is an important distinction; namely that Suarez is not admitted racist, he merely used offensive words to cause effect (like most people on here do every single day when they think about it). He does not have anything against Evra's color, but he knew Evra would be put off by it. I think biting a guy is much lower than saying bad words to another and deserves exactly the ban he got. Question though; will he get 10 games + 2 for the ten yellow cards he has collected in the Prem this season? Which means 12 games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts