Jump to content

Speculation: Steven Fletcher (Wolves)


KjParton

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 591
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The price is a little steep but remember strikers will always go for more than most other players.

Remember Wolves signed him for 7m and have to give 15% to Burnley. He's 25 and still has two years to run on his contract so I don't think it's unreasonable for them to want 10m.

Is it anymore ridiculous than a premier league club playing 10m for Curtis Davies or 7m for Fabien Delph? Remind me again who that team was, both players had far less top level experience than Fletcher does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it anymore ridiculous than a premier league club playing 10m for Curtis Davies or 7m for Fabien Delph? Remind me again who that team was, both players had far less top level experience than Fletcher does.

What a roaring success they were!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it anymore ridiculous than a premier league club playing 10m for Curtis Davies or 7m for Fabien Delph? Remind me again who that team was, both players had far less top level experience than Fletcher does.

What a roaring success they were!

ok then Ashley Young. We shouldnt rule out players becuase they're from wolves. Hes a decent player who has scored prem goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The price is a little steep but remember strikers will always go for more than most other players.

Is it anymore ridiculous than a premier league club playing 10m for Curtis Davies or 7m for Fabien Delph? Remind me again who that team was, both players had far less top level experience than Fletcher does.

1. But he's not a prolific goalscorer that would warrant such a price tag.

2. Us paying stupid fees for Delph/Davies doesn't make paying a stupid one for Fletcher any less stupid does it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the main question is?.. would sf be better than gabby & get more goals? i would say who ever sf plays for next year he will get more goals than gabby,yes gabby is injured but if fit i would still bet fletcher nets more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please FFS, make any link between Villa and this ridiculous transfer fee go away.

100%

This!!!!!

**** paying the dirty, scruffy dingle bastards £15m for a 10 goal a season striker!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the main question is?.. would sf be better than gabby & get more goals? i would say who ever sf plays for next year he will get more goals than gabby,yes gabby is injured but if fit i would still bet fletcher nets more

No, the main question is would he get enough to warrant a 15m transfer fee. And going on his previous form/record the answer is a resounding NO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â