Jump to content

Sportswash! - Let’s oil stare at Manchester City!


Zatman

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, PaulC said:

Does that make him better though.  He never won the champions league at a massive club like Real Madrid. His did win one la liga title but his final season there was poor. 

Yes it does because the achievement of winning the Champions League with a fairly 'small' club like Porto with a tiny budget trumps anything Guardiola will ever do in football. Also on the topic of big clubs you could argue that Guardiola at most had Bayern standing still and certainly didn't do the job Heynckes did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, PaulC said:

Ok both are on even footing now with the squads they have. Lets see who the better manager is!

But Mourinho has already brought United further from where they were when he started.  That we're even discussing this as a level playing field is testament to how he can turn a side around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BOF said:

But Mourinho has already brought United further from where they were when he started.  That we're even discussing this as a level playing field is testament to how he can turn a side around.

And spent £300m+ doing. So I'm not sure if that counts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stevo985 said:

And spent £300m+ doing. So I'm not sure if that counts.

Wait. So the money they spend does now get taken into account when assessing them?  Which set of guidelines are we judging these managers by?  And are they being judged by the same criteria as each other?  Or does Guardiola get to spend what he wants and not be judged on it because that's just his way, but everyone else is criticised for trying to compete?

The fact as I see it is that Mourinho has made more progress at United on less money in less time than Guardiola has, and he has also done more over his career and in more trying circumstances.  We agree that Pep is very good at what he does, but let's not over egg it.  If we're going to compare him to more rounded and accomplished managers top trumps style then he's going to be found sorely wanting.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BOF said:

Wait. So the money they spend does now get taken into account when assessing them?  Which set of guidelines are we judging these managers by?  And are they being judged by the same criteria as each other?  Or does Guardiola get to spend what he wants and not be judged on it because that's just his way, but everyone else is criticised for trying to compete?

I was being sarcastic... ;) 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BOF said:

But Mourinho has already brought United further from where they were when he started.  That we're even discussing this as a level playing field is testament to how he can turn a side around.

I'm talking about squads that's all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PaulC said:

I'm talking about squads that's all

So you want to see who the better manager is, by effectively cleaning the slate and ignoring the difference between what both have had to do to even get to this point, because they've now got even footing.  I'd say that's a massively flawed approach.  Management isn't just about sailing the ship.  It's about getting it seaworthy in the first place.  JMHO.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2017 at 22:16, PaulC said:

As Brian Clough once said I want to win but win it better. No doubt Pep could do what Jose does and win more trophies but Pep wants to do by playing attractive football. 

That did Clough well at Leeds ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a very interesting subplot this season in Manchester.

Is there any way Pep can be deemed a success at City without winning the league title? Of course if he wins the champions league but Man. City to me have never seemed comfortable as a club in that competition and obviously the league is much easier to win given the lack of competition.

Context of that of course is it denies Mourinho the league.

Mourinho is the sort given how he provokes other managers and football people that needs to keep winning titles. He got out of jail last season with the cups. If Man. United don't win the league then it's five years without a league title so they'd start worrying they're turning into Liverpool with a long title drought.

Way football is nowadays neither will get as long as Fergie did to get things right.

What's certain is one will miss out and then the fun will begin.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2017 at 22:16, PaulC said:

As Brian Clough once said I want to win but win it better. No doubt Pep could do what Jose does and win more trophies but Pep wants to do by playing attractive football. 

Man. United haven't been that bad to watch this season. They're smashed 4-5 teams by 4 goals.

Of course Mourinho is pragmatic in big games particularly away from home. Pep might have to be at some stage this season aswell to get over the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BOF said:

So you want to see who the better manager is, by effectively cleaning the slate and ignoring the difference between what both have had to do to even get to this point, because they've now got even footing.  I'd say that's a massively flawed approach.  Management isn't just about sailing the ship.  It's about getting it seaworthy in the first place.  JMHO.

I'd say Man U underperformed last year and got lucky with the Europa league which they nearly went out of against Celta Vigo. He was fortunate to inherit some fantastic young talent and be able to go out and buy Pogba and Lukaku. so don't think much difference to what Pep had at Man City

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TrentVilla said:

Well other than the £222m he spent... apart from that yeah he made do with what he had... what a trooper...

£222m plus a squad with world class players he inherited 

its a tough life

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, VillaChris said:

It's a very interesting subplot this season in Manchester.

Is there any way Pep can be deemed a success at City without winning the league title? Of course if he wins the champions league but Man. City to me have never seemed comfortable as a club in that competition and obviously the league is much easier to win given the lack of competition.

Context of that of course is it denies Mourinho the league.

Mourinho is the sort given how he provokes other managers and football people that needs to keep winning titles. He got out of jail last season with the cups. If Man. United don't win the league then it's five years without a league title so they'd start worrying they're turning into Liverpool with a long title drought.

Way football is nowadays neither will get as long as Fergie did to get things right.

What's certain is one will miss out and then the fun will begin.

What about if one wins the league and the other the champions league. I think the champions league for City is the most important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â