Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That although Palace lost he can't have had that bad a game. If there were no positives to take from it he won't be on the bench. I'll hold my hands up and say my analysis is wrong if he's not on the bench. That would indicate there were no positives.

Posted

Him being on the bench won't prove your analysis right, it will just mean that he is the next best option they have behind those starting the game. He still won't be any good.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Will you take it all back if he's on the bench against Leicester?

Will you never post a single thing about bannan either directly or indirectly again if he doesn't?

 

 

 

No, but I will promise 2 months Bannan free, whatever happens. If I slip up, someone send me a PM and we can add another 2 months on to that. 

 

Please note though that I was not the one who bumped this thread.

Posted

That although Palace lost he can't have had that bad a game. If there were no positives to take from it he won't be on the bench. I'll hold my hands up and say my analysis is wrong if he's not on the bench. That would indicate there were no positives.

 

It's official... Con has been defeated. His analysis is wrong and always has been wrong as per the below:

 

Capture.jpg

Posted

Not a warnock player. Expect a loan signing to Millwall from Holloway who seems to be the only manager in the world to rate the fella.

 

Not a Warnock player...but realistically not an anyone player really.

Posted

Con cant even comment on this, a 2 month Bannan ban. Fairplay to Con, he has finally said I hold my hands up, I was wrong.

Posted (edited)

A bannan thread without con is like Ian without Jimmy Krankie

 

krankies80s.jpg

Edited by Richard
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Â