Jump to content

Premier League 2020-21 thread


Jareth

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, rjw63 said:

Why Southampton and Wet Spam?

Villa and Newcastle have had more seasons in the Preeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeemier League.

Our relegations were more recent, it's the 9 teams with the current longest spell in the league. It's arbitrary really though, the proposal has been designed so any 3 clubs could fill that slot, all that's needed is the top 6 to agree on something to implement changes.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The EFL or PL would have loved the power to block NSWE if they could. This is a disgusting power grab that will kill 90% of the English game no matter how much ’charity’ they offer. 

Just let them have their breakaway European super league so we can have a far more balanced top tier of English football. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes the top six in the Premier league pretty much a fixed group and gives them additional funding to ensure they don't drop out.

They've given dome assurance to three teams who've bought it for the short term benefit.

It will essentially leave the other twelve teams in the Premier league as fodder collecting TV money and prevented from investing or earning enough to upset the applecart.

It works for six teams and it works for selling TV abroad.

It doesn't work for football.

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The_Steve said:

Would this even be legal under competition law? The other Premier League clubs have every right to sue. 

If it gets voted in, they don't.

From what I can gather, this would mean that nine clubs cannot be relegated. It's an absolute shocker.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The removal of parachute payments is also the top six abandoning the rest of the league if they're relegated - it would result in the top six being "The Premier league" and everyone else having "succeeded" by getting a year of TV money. It's a two tier system divided at the 7th place spot in the Premier League - the top six play for honours, everyone else bounces between the Championship and the Premier league with the only prize being Premier league TV money for a bit. 

The Championship clubs would be a little bit richer, apart from the recently relegated ones who would have to make the big drop from Premier money and because of no parachute they'd need to bank some of that money and not spend too heavily on promotion - and then the change to distribution of Premier league TV money would mean that the teams from 7th-18th wouldn't get the same share they get now, so they'd be slightly poorer.

It brings the teams in the Championship and the teams from 7th-18th in the Premier league closer together by making the Championship clubs slightly richer and the Premier league clubs poorer while separating the top six completely.

United in particular are terrified of Everton, of Wolves, of teams with potential like us or a better owned Newcastle - they're pulling up the drawbridge.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They want to turn it into the NFL, with United and Liverpool playing massive friendly fixtures in Sydney, Beijing, and the Middle East with some major corporate sponsor on board. Everyone else scraps for a little bigger piece of the TV money whilst being pillaged for their best young players. 

For the elites, everything below the top 10 is just an exhibition. They’d never lose their places or risk relegation. 
 

A 5 down 3 up model for relegation is utterly barmy, how will that help clubs build financial stability? How will the EFL govern to prevent a repeat of Wigan and Charlton? I agree that the EFL and lower leagues need a bailout but £250m ain’t it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, The_Steve said:

Imagine Southampton vetoing the ownership plans for a newly promoted club etc. It’s ridiculous. It will create the ultimate two-tier system.  

Southampton, West Ham, etc are a distraction.

If Man United, Liverpool, Man City, Chelsea, Arsenal and Spurs agree to something, it happens. It fully consolidates power in the hands of the teams that have been in the top 6 for the past few years. 

It's the same as FFP. It's the current richest clubs pulling the ladder up behind themselves. If this passes, we should burn it all down and start again.

As for the £100m "gift" to the FA...They're not even hiding the corruption. I despise the people that run this sport.

Edited by Davkaus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole thing is scary.  Really scary. 

I just hope to god the rest of the PL clubs vote against this because if you are not in the club you will be devestated. 

Oh and another thing to thank Randy for.  If this horror show does come to pass, at least we would have been in the club if we hadn't have been relegated following his diobolical running of our club. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The_Steve said:

They want to turn it into the NFL.

In fairness it's the opposite - the USA operates its healthcare and its economy on the most vicious profit base imaginable - but it operates its sports on socialism - on the draft and on limits on spending and squad size - they do that because they know that sport dies without random results and hope. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, OutByEaster? said:

 

From what I can gather, this would mean that nine clubs cannot be relegated. It's an absolute shocker.

 

I've not read anything to suggest this is true. If one of the 9 went down, they'd be replaced by the next longest serving, from what I understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â