Jump to content

The banker loving, baby-eating Tory party thread (regenerated)


blandy

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, foreveryoung said:

In reality could Cruella not be charged for inciting violence, never mind sacked.

Trump was, if someone gets seriously injured then it’ll be even more important she is seen to be brought to justice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Braverman's career should be hanging from a lamppost before the days out.

Sadly we have a completely feeble PM who represents the scummy film on the top of the Tory Party pond, so she'll be out tomorrow and next week spinning how right (in both senses of the word) she was and this'll be swept under the carpet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the Home Secretary said the Met Police are bias against right wing extremists and when you look at those arrest numbers you can see that they arrested over 100 of the 900 fascist pricks and 30 of the 300,000 Ceasefire hate marchers.

Case closed.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, picicata said:

More pertinently, why is she worthy of an interview? She's a clueless arse

Strange as it may seem, she’s not actually that mad this morning.

She has a point with regards to Sunak, he does shoulder some of the blame as Baroness Chakrobarti pointed out, his statement about holding The Police Commissioner to account was as much an attempt to undermine the independence of the Police as Braverman's article. It didn’t contain the same dangerous rhetoric but was similarly an attempt to undermine and empower the far right thugs.

Also Mad Nad was right about Gove, what was he doing there? He has for for it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bickster said:

Also Mad Nad was right about Gove, what was he doing there? He has for for it too.

It might be sinister and performative, but most people at train stations are there to catch a train rather than involve themselves in political protest.

He might just have been doing that. 

Edited by ml1dch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ml1dch said:

It might be sinister and performative, but most people at train stations are there to catch a train rather than involve themselves in political protest.

He might just have been doing that. 

He has a bit of history for walking into protests. hence the suspicion of his motives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bickster said:

He has a bit of history for walking into protests. hence the suspicion of his motives.

Nads did make a point on that too, every other politician was staying well out of the way to avoid making the police job harder, then Gove appears right in the epicentre… again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ml1dch said:

It might be sinister and performative, but most people at train stations are there to catch a train rather than involve themselves in political protest.

He might just have been doing that. 

Or he could be one of politics more weird weirdos that sets out to walk through protests or rock up inexplicably at pub discos.

He’s a bit, odd.

 

 

Edited by chrisp65
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â