quizme Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 I'm hoping for atleast 20 million, after all Richard is so damn positive so something must be going on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVTuco Posted June 22, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted June 22, 2012 It's 15 mill +/- 1 mill, and yeah it's Richards fault that these predictions are so high... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbr600rr Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 20m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ads Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 Thirty million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddywhack Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 20-25m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amsterdam_Neil_D Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 Should be 30+ ...will be about 12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 In terms of how much, enough to satisfy Lamber that coming here was going to be worthwhile in terms of a challenge he could have a fair crack at succeeding in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 £8M and 50% of any sales Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted June 22, 2012 Moderator Share Posted June 22, 2012 Net spend? I'm thinking it will be around £12m tops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smetrov Posted June 22, 2012 Author Share Posted June 22, 2012 In terms of how much, enough to satisfy Lamber that coming here was going to be worthwhile in terms of a challenge he could have a fair crack at succeeding in I dunno so much. I am starting to think he wasn't going to be at Norwich very much longer anyway.....than the villa job came along - which he viewed as a marginally better prospect than Norwich without Grant Holt. £10m net spend tops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxy1 Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 In terms of how much, enough to satisfy Lamber that coming here was going to be worthwhile in terms of a challenge he could have a fair crack at succeeding in I dunno so much. I am starting to think he wasn't going to be at Norwich very much longer anyway.....than the villa job came along - which he viewed as a marginally better prospect than Norwich without Grant Holt. £10m net spend tops. Final answer? You seemed pretty set on £9m in you opening post ...10 would be too obvious, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark8691 Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 One hundred and Eighty. I think i lose.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smetrov Posted June 22, 2012 Author Share Posted June 22, 2012 In terms of how much, enough to satisfy Lamber that coming here was going to be worthwhile in terms of a challenge he could have a fair crack at succeeding in I dunno so much. I am starting to think he wasn't going to be at Norwich very much longer anyway.....than the villa job came along - which he viewed as a marginally better prospect than Norwich without Grant Holt. £10m net spend tops. Final answer? You seemed pretty set on £9m in you opening post ...10 would be too obvious, right? Jesus a stalker ! I initially said £9m - and Iam now saying £10m tops - in the post above i explained my counter arguement to 'Lambert wouldn't come without a big budget' theory Youre allowed more than one go - and can your mind if you wish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CI Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 I heard some blokes in Waitrose talking (they were wearing suits) and they mentioned £20m. I'll go for 50% of that so £10m it is. Ah Waitrose A higher standard of intel ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
romavillan Posted June 22, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted June 22, 2012 hard to say, i reckon he's going to have a go at getting rid of a fair few of the bad apples/dead wood/crap. how successfull he is at that and how much he gets in will probably affect how deep lerner goes into his pockets. if lambert has said it's essential that these players go, so they go at a lower price than expected, lerner will need to spend more to acheive the goals that lambert and lerner have discussed. on the other hand, if we get some decent money for outgoing players, then lerner will probably not feel the need to cough up as much. i'd expect to see 4 or 5 go, and get 5 or 6 in, with a net spend of around 20m or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 It will be £12m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ender4 Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 £18mill net spend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxy1 Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 In terms of how much, enough to satisfy Lamber that coming here was going to be worthwhile in terms of a challenge he could have a fair crack at succeeding in I dunno so much. I am starting to think he wasn't going to be at Norwich very much longer anyway.....than the villa job came along - which he viewed as a marginally better prospect than Norwich without Grant Holt. £10m net spend tops. Final answer? You seemed pretty set on £9m in you opening post ...10 would be too obvious, right? Jesus a stalker ! I initially said £9m - and Iam now saying £10m tops - in the post above i explained my counter arguement to 'Lambert wouldn't come without a big budget' theory Youre allowed more than one go - and can your mind if you wish Just on the wind up mate! I reckon you only started this so that Richard would show his cards ...which of course he didn't. Anyway I think around £15m though I get the sense that committed wages / ongoing cost is more of a priority, so who knows there could be another Bent like signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiegoD Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 £19.8 mil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoughboroughLion Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 I don't think it's about the transfer fees, but more about the wages. Having said that, I'll join the fun and say 17m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts