Stevo985 Posted January 17 VT Supporter Share Posted January 17 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Teale's 'tache said: The problem is it is in the second less visible tweet. He knows (or should know as somebody with so much experience in the industry) that this is what has happened, there's no 'could' about it, but he has still tried to mislead people in his first and most visible tweet for some reason (most likely clout/interactions). It's just irresponsible. Misinformation is a global problem at the moment and 'experts' like Lee using their knowledge to manufacture outrage is not very helpful to anyone. I don't think he's done that at all. I think you're seeing something that isn't htere Edited January 17 by Stevo985 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyblade Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Just now, Stevo985 said: I don't think he's done that at all. I think you're twisting it Even if not intentional, it's the end result. The second tweet has almost 1/10th the impressions as the first. It's irresponsible at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teale's 'tache Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 2 minutes ago, Stevo985 said: I don't think he's done that at all. I think you're twisting it Just calling it as I see it, I do not need to twist anything, but you're most welcome to ignore my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GarethRDR Posted January 17 Popular Post Share Posted January 17 1 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MapleVilla Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 8 hours ago, fightoffyour said: Would much prefer something like this, ignoring, if one can, my fudged, bucket-fill detailing on the lion: It's also pix-elated the crotch area of the lion 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sne Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 7 minutes ago, MapleVilla said: It's also pix-elated the crotch area of the lion Probably for the American market. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Captain_Townsend Posted January 17 Popular Post Share Posted January 17 2 hours ago, Mic09 said: Don't worry, we'll have another go next year. We might not be getting our shiny new 13k seater North stand but we are going to have a right good go at being the first club to have 13,000 concept badges online! 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick76 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 9 minutes ago, Captain_Townsend said: We might not be getting our shiny new 13k seater North stand but we are going to have a right good go at being the first club to have 13,000 concept badges online! Jeez, Heck’s kids are going to be busy crayoning 13,000 different badges this year. At least they can only get better than the first one, 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post The_Steve Posted January 17 Popular Post Share Posted January 17 6 hours ago, Villa_Vids said: Counterpoint: a random Shutterstock account stole IP content and re-uploaded them as vectors. They've also stolen the Spurs logo and uploaded it as "rooster bird" and the Cologne goat as "jumping goat". This isn't the gotcha the thread claims it to be. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderPower_14 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 7 hours ago, Stevo985 said: I don't think he's done that at all. I think you're seeing something that isn't htere He's definitely insinuating that the 2015 lion could have been stolen from Shutterstock, which is insane and absolutely misinformation that appears designed to discredit the club. He's not saying it definitively was stolen, but that's misinformation in the modern world isn't it. Insinuate without flat out making a direct claim so you can stir up unrest but back away from what you've said when it's challenged. The Jordan Peterson method. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post thabucks Posted January 18 Popular Post Share Posted January 18 The lion is definitely not lifted from shutterstock and the guy is a self seeking moron … Do your homework kids before making statements for attention. https://someoneinlondon.com/projects/the-claws-are-out 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JAMAICAN-VILLAN Posted January 18 Popular Post Share Posted January 18 (edited) 14 minutes ago, thabucks said: The lion is definitely not lifted from shutterstock and the guy is a self seeking moron … Do your homework kids before making statements for attention. https://someoneinlondon.com/projects/the-claws-are-out My thing is, even if it WAS purchased from Shutterstock ( It wasn't ) then what would be the issue lol. Those sites are literally meant to provide design resources and aids, which people can then use as inspiration and nucleus of a design to build on. People are just desperate to find any sort of excuse to slam Heck/ the process etc. Paying a design agency 500,000 pounds to design a vector similar to what you could get on Shutterstock doesn't make it any more prestigious... It makes it stupid Edited January 18 by JAMAICAN-VILLAN 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted January 18 VT Supporter Share Posted January 18 11 hours ago, The_Steve said: Counterpoint: a random Shutterstock account stole IP content and re-uploaded them as vectors. They've also stolen the Spurs logo and uploaded it as "rooster bird" and the Cologne goat as "jumping goat". This isn't the gotcha the thread claims it to be. He doesn't say that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderPower_14 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 2 minutes ago, Stevo985 said: He doesn't say that What's the point of the post then? He's clearly trying to cast doubt over the lion being made for the badge. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
est1874 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 4 minutes ago, Stevo985 said: He doesn't say that "Maybe just consider that you might not be right, especially as you seem to be in the overwhelming minority" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Risso Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 A random bloke on Twitter got something wrong, oh the humanity. That doesn't sound like it really matters that much. Less so than our new idiot President of Operations making a complete hash of the entire rebranding process anyway. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teale's 'tache Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 27 minutes ago, JAMAICAN-VILLAN said: My thing is, even if it WAS purchased from Shutterstock ( It wasn't ) then what would be the issue lol. Those sites are literally meant to provide design resources and aids, which people can then use as inspiration and nucleus of a design to build on. People are just desperate to find any sort of excuse to slam Heck/ the process etc. Paying a design agency 500,000 pounds to design a vector similar to what you could get on Shutterstock doesn't make it any more prestigious... It makes it stupid The issue would be that anyone could purchase a license for that same lion from Shutterstock and do whatever they wanted with it, and we'd have absolutely no leg to stand on from a legal point of view. With a brand as big as ours you want protection over your image/brand. Having a lion custom made and copywrited protects you from having your lion plastered all over porn sites, or another club hijacking our popularity by adopting the same lion etc. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 1 hour ago, thabucks said: The lion is definitely not lifted from shutterstock and the guy is a self seeking moron … Do your homework kids before making statements for attention. https://someoneinlondon.com/projects/the-claws-are-out Thanks for this. Bumping so people don’t miss it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted January 18 VT Supporter Share Posted January 18 45 minutes ago, est1874 said: "Maybe just consider that you might not be right, especially as you seem to be in the overwhelming minority" Thanks for the advice. On this occasion it's in black and white, so I know I'm right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMAICAN-VILLAN Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 16 hours ago, sne said: Probably for the American market. You mean Japanese porn obviously. Not like I'd know about it anyway... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts