VILLAMARV

Scoring a backheel goal in my weekly kick about that I have no right in scoring. I'll be seeing that one in my dreams tonight.

Or, could it possibly be that every single one of your posts has been written in bad faith? Ignoring questions you don't want to answer, denying actual proveable factual arguments, throwing around accusations of hypocrisy in a projecting manner due to the undeniable hypocrisy of your posts. Which is more likely - everyone else in the whole world has a problem or that you are here with an agenda and a complete lack of debating skills - in any language - and are continually posting in bad faith. I'd hazard a guess that most posters would go for the latter. You could prove us all wrong of course, but you'd have to go back and actually answer questions people have asked you and wwithdraw your false accusations and issue a few apologies and then, through the pattern of behaviour, people will be able to discern for themselves whether you are acting in bad faith or not. So I think I would guess that you don't have the ability or the humility to do any of that. Oh and FYI no one, absolutely no one who is posting in good faith uses bold and large font.

This is definitely me. I love hot stuff of all sorts but a few years ago I started sweating eating the rather mild curry sauce from the chipy and MrsVM hasn't stopped laughing about it since.

I love hiring the red carpet cleaner from the supermarket. Such a rewarding few hours seeing all that black water disappear down the drain.

aaaahh, a blind spot in my cultural reference catalogue. I didnt think derrek accorah had a mullet.

Out of likes but a Bottom quote can't go by without a tip of the hat

is that the singer from ABC?

quoting for posterity

In terms of the historical licensing question on the other page the magistrates court records should hold licensing applications from the pre-council issued era. Local LVA or FLVA (Licenced Victuallers Association) records would also be pretty complete as a cross reference. I'd have thought they'd be available to anyone interested.

to be fair he did add the smiley face to accentuate the sarcasm at his own hypocrisy this time

It's not a language thing. it's quite clearly and demonstrably a disingenuous thing. Olive branches only work in a meaningful exchange.

Shameless

Just looked a bit laboured at times - didn't move the ball quick enough, but having said that credit to Cooper and Forest. Always seemed to have an extra player closing down on the crucial pass or for the cutback or turn. Every time the camera panned towards their box it seemed they had a narrow 3 positioned in front of the goal/keeper that we never found a way through.

Of all the f***witted posts I've had to contend with over the years yours are without a doubt the most pathetic and disingenuous of the lot. Of course I don't want "to ask you a question or something" . I've asked you plenty of direct questions and you've ignored them all! Hence your undeniable, on the record hypocrisy. I'm the word removed you have made personal accusations about in this thread. Including ones calling me a hypocrite. You have posted some of the most childish responses to any posts I have ever witnessed in my many years on this site. And yet here we are.Feel free to prove what you say by completely changing the personality and attitude that your posts project to the outside world, or, alternatively, just carry on acting and conversing like a spoilt child. But your posts, just extreme merriment. The world outside your echo chamber is laughing at you.

Can I be the one who decides who should and shouldn't have kids? I presume it's got full pension and all that jazz.

and long may it continue

Chambers, Dendonker and Olsen for me. We can do better in all 3 positions. Whether we can do it in this window is a good question but there's better players out there.

I think we're totally wasted on this crowd @magnkarl.

I seem to remember watching this, like a wildlife on one spin off. IIRC it was advertised on Blue Peter.