Jump to content

VILLAMARV

Established Members
  • Content Count

    7,663
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

VILLAMARV last won the day on August 14 2019

VILLAMARV had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

6,731 Excellent

About VILLAMARV

  • Rank
    Star Player

Recent Profile Visitors

3,791 profile views
  1. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52667502
  2. This actually made me laugh out loud, which today is quite the feat. Thank you. (Also I may steal it like a good meme) It's great how flags can spell word removed these days.
  3. I think that's the key word myself. They'll pass the buck just like has already started to happen re: the post about Jeremy Hunt blaming the scientific advice in the commons. And like many on here have called from early on.
  4. Patient care pathways are boring though. It all adds up to contribute to the decisions, which all ultimately mean nothing at all if there is no room at the inn. The point (in reality) around the advice discussed yesterday is surely that once the room had been made in the system to accommodate higher numbers of admissions that the advice was withdrawn or changed and that's the thing getting lost I feel while everyone riffs off people's individual previous posts. (Including me).
  5. About quarter past I think
  6. I genuinely don't know. And that's not to be obtuse or obstructive but, as ever, it's complicated. I don't believe you will find anything like that written on a government website if that's what you mean, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's not part of any triage guidance for clinicians. If that means you can 'win' a semantic argument on the internet with someone, go ahead and claim your internet points if it serves a purpose, but individual clinicians at individual trusts may well have different guidance. Don't forget the conversation moved some time ago to one of protecting finite resourc
  7. Why are you wilfully ignoring the rest of that post about how your change of tense changes the context?
  8. Hilarious. You seem intent on winning some imaginary argument. You could, if you were being genuine, actually engage with what I've said. That might get us somewhere conversationally. I am not the other posters. I have not made the claims you keep referring back to. I am not here to engage in cyclical arguments about things I didn't say. I haven't dodged anything. You appear to have conveniently glossed over the point I did make though, about different words and changing the context. Which I felt added value. Unlike this back and forth.
  9. No. What I think, is what I said. Not whatever you rephrase it as.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of use Terms of Use, Cookies We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Â