Jump to content

Scottish Independence


maqroll

Recommended Posts

It would seem that devo-max creates rather more problems for the UK constitution than an independent Scotland would have done.

 

Answering the West Lothian question seems like a good idea in principle but it is easy to envisage a Labour government which could only implement half its policies, if robbed of their decisive Scottish seats/votes on crucial issues.

 

Whatever powers are eventually devolved would be stripped from any Labour government in London should they not have a majority in rUK.

 

People get excited by the idea of devolving powers away from London and into the regions but they don't realise how financially dependent they are on taxes generated in London.

 

The country is spending 10% more than it is raising in taxes - thus the deficit - but some of the regions (NE) are spending 20% more than they raise locally by taxation' so for many regions devolution would not do anything positive.

 

But this is very much a Left perspective because I am sure that the Tories will see many advantages in a federalised UK, where regions only spend what they raise locally in taxation.

 

I am sure Cameron is rubbing his hands with glee at the prospect of how well devolution will serve the Tories.

 

Those who dread what new taxes Miliband might be dreaming up, might think likewise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The interesting bit is the 16-24 age group. Poll data in the run up for months suggested that the 16-18 age group were consistently in the NO camp and thats the group that Salmond fought tooth and nail to get enfranchised.

Big Fail on his behalf.

Then the closer people get to pensionable age the more likely they are to think… shit wheres my state pension heading here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The interesting bit is the 16-24 age group. Poll data in the run up for months suggested that the 16-18 age group were consistently in the NO camp and thats the group that Salmond fought tooth and nail to get enfranchised.

There was an Ashcroft poll in the Grauniad (here) which had the 18-24 group broken down as follows:

Scottish independence: poll reveals who voted, how and why

16-17: Yes - 71%; No - 29%

18-24: Yes - 48%; No - 52%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think all voting at a General Election should be done through a phone in following a television special in which all the parties have a 10 minute slot to sell their vision for the country. They could even sing or dance those visions. No restrictions.

Arguably we'd have Nick Clegg as PM right now had we done that in 2010
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But generally, lowering the age to 16 should be a good thing.

Either that, or raise the age of everything else to 18.

 

When a 16-year-old runs off with their schoolteacher they are deemed too emotionally immature to make an informed decision, but simultaneously they are considered mature enough to vote.

 

I can't square this circle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take on it is the 25-39 are the ones ruined by the crash, bank bailouts and austerity measures with no prospect of home ownership or already owning and defaulting on a recently taken out mortgage/reposession.

I say 'my take' mainly because I'm part of that group. If I was their age, which I am, I'd be pissed, which I am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But generally, lowering the age to 16 should be a good thing.

Either that, or raise the age of everything else to 18.

 

When a 16-year-old runs off with their schoolteacher they are deemed too emotionally immature to make an informed decision, but simultaneously they are considered mature enough to vote.

 

I can't square this circle.

When a 16 year old runs off with their schoolteacher, the outcry has nothing to do with the emotional immaturity of the victim. It is however everything to do with the schoolteacher abusing his/her position of responsibility for that person.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

But generally, lowering the age to 16 should be a good thing.

Either that, or raise the age of everything else to 18.

 

When a 16-year-old runs off with their schoolteacher they are deemed too emotionally immature to make an informed decision, but simultaneously they are considered mature enough to vote.

 

I can't square this circle.

 

When a 16 year old runs off with their schoolteacher, the outcry has nothing to do with the emotional immaturity of the victim. It is however everything to do with the schoolteacher abusing his/her position of responsibility for that person.

 

I thought the outcry was usually "jammy git"  followed by trying to work out how the teacher has time for extra marital affairs what with all that course work to prepare , papers to mark and so on

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â