avfc89 Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 SHA looked decent against United to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted August 18, 2009 Moderator Share Posted August 18, 2009 SHA looked decent against United to be honest. That is one way of looking at it, the other would be that it was one of the worst Utd performances I can remember in recent years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avfc89 Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 SHA looked decent against United to be honest. That is one way of looking at it, the other would be that it was one of the worst Utd performances I can remember in recent years. United created alot of chances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted August 18, 2009 Moderator Share Posted August 18, 2009 SHA looked decent against United to be honest. That is one way of looking at it, the other would be that it was one of the worst Utd performances I can remember in recent years. United created alot of chances. And they fail to take so many how often exactly? Also if Utd created lots of chances what makes you say SHA were decent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wedge Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 Every time I see the phrase "SHA" it makes me chuckle... Hehehehehehehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Namaste Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 i will judge after 38 games not one thanks! You sound like O'Neill. Do YOU still need 38 games to judge our very own Curtis Davies? Ferguson played better than any of our midfielders which was more relevant than what might happen over the course of 38 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw63 Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 Well, we can't laugh at small heath's 93rd minute disputed penalty, lucky **** scum. But we CAN laugh at the attendance of 19, 922 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtsimonw Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 That is awful. I wonder when the last time we got an attendance as low as that? We get more for bloody friendlies! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si. Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 **** SCUM SHIT WANK LUCKY words removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw63 Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 **** SCUM SHIT WANK LUCKY words removed I concur fully with this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 that was not a penalty talk about robbery. however luck can only get you so far they do not look like a threat scoring goals which must be worrying for them they are fortunate that hull and pompey are so poor as those two are odds on for relegation espically hull. if i wa sthem i would get rid of brown asap if they want to stay up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted August 20, 2009 VT Supporter Share Posted August 20, 2009 Yeung taking over Blues, again. £81.5m :shock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paddy Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 Yeung taking over Blues, again. £81.5m :shock: I love this bloke. I can't wait to see their all Chinese XI that he talked about playing in the Championship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 how are they worth that much-more than what lerner paid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paddy Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 how are they worth that much-more than what lerner paid? How much did he pay in the end? I can't remember. Initially around £80m was talked about, did it end up as nearer £60m? £63m rings a bell for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oaks Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 All this Yeung takeover shite contributed to them getting relegated last time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted August 20, 2009 VT Supporter Share Posted August 20, 2009 how are they worth that much-more than what lerner paid? How much did he pay in the end? I can't remember. Initially around £80m was talked about, did it end up as nearer £60m? £63m rings a bell for some reason. I think it was inded £63m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 i had it down as £63m too when randy came calling for my 1 share it might just be the markets increasing and 3 years have passed, could also be that for all his faults doug didnt fleece randy for the benefit of his pension fund, if the rumours are true and they want west ham, they'll take him to the cleaners just wish he'd made his move a month ago and they'd done a pompey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villahero Posted August 20, 2009 Share Posted August 20, 2009 he's just paid a non returnable 3 mil deposit.....i'd be pissed that wasn't the overall price !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 surely now after everything randy has done villa must be worth near 100m? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts