The first decent team England have played in the whole competition, not counting England reserves vs Belgium reserves in the race to lose match. It will be interesting to see how they cope. I cant see England beating both Croatia and France/Belgium but it's definitely possible.
These Russian players have the energy levels of someone who has been on a systematic doping programme for 24 months. Good job there's no drugs in football.
Exactly what I expected to happen. Bought the club, gambled on getting promoted quickly and cashing in, failed, now wants to get his money back despite his own mis-management.
There's going to be a lot of complaints in this thread come Monday morning. The logo is shit lads. We know it's shit and we know it's going to be on the jersey. It's time to accept it.
One thing that is odd is the pink on the training kit. The last thing we need is yet another home kit that's not actually claret.
It's not though and that's my whole point. If you look at the examples you listed you'll find plenty of people/pundits/refs who will disagree with your judgement.
How do you determine if a player has deliberately handled a ball? Unless you are a mind reader you'll never know. So it's a subjective decision and the rule isn't clear because you can't actually determine what's deliberate and what's not. And that's just one example, there are lots of other rules/fouls in the game that aren't clear and are totally subjective.
1. Yes they are and it's nonsense to claim otherwise. That's why referees/fans/pundits disagree over whether something was a foul or not. 2. The rules of the game aren't clear For example handball situations.
Indeed but I would argue that given the wage bill and the support in the transfer market he's failed to improve us enough in both his seasons here. It just depends what your point of view is.