lapal_fan Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 that pen was gay :cry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudevillaisnice Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Nocerino.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFC-Prideofbrum Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Er... no yellow card for Xavi? No yellow card for Ambrosini? He hasn't booked anyone apart from the penalties and I think Seedorf for continuous dissent. Both were stone wall penalties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 referee has well and truly lost the plot, never a penalty. happens 20 times a game and Puyol was grabbing Nesta as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudevillaisnice Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 You'd be giving Penalties in every game for about 10-15 times.. it happens in every game. VERY VERY soft penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFC-Prideofbrum Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 referee has well and truly lost the plot, never a penalty. happens 20 times a game and Puyol was grabbing Nesta as well Wow. This wasn't just a quick shirt grab, Busquets is away from him and he's just hauled him down. You're actually unbelievable. I'm sure a Barca player could be kicked in the head and two footed by two different players despite not even having the ball and it wouldn't be anything wrong with it. Jesus Christ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Both penalties for me, the second was particularly idiotic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunRickyRun Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Could do with this ref for the game against Stoke! Definite penalty. Fair play to the ref for giving it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted April 3, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted April 3, 2012 Both penalties. The second one wasn't your standard shirt pull. It's a calculated shirt pull and he hauls him to the ground. Nesta could quite easily have been booked or worse earlier anyway. He flew in two footed on Fabregas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted April 3, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted April 3, 2012 2nd penalty for Barca and a booking to anyone who was within 5 yards of the box in a Milan shirt. Shocker. He booked Nesta for the foul, and one other for dissent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtsimonw Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Both were stone wall penalties. Puyol fouled Nesta before Nesta took down Busquets. It's a free kick to Milan, no doubt. Though shocker, nobody sees the Barca fouls, what a surprise - Nesta/Busquets also wouldn't have gone to ground had Puyol not made the foul. So to give that over the Puyol foul is quite a laughable decision. But this is Barca we're talking about. Hell, Fabregas even had his arm accross Ambro's face early in the game THEN Ambro won the ball and he still gives Cesc the free kick. No bias from the refs though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 ITS ALL A CONSPRIRACY!!!! 111111eleven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFC-Prideofbrum Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Both were stone wall penalties. Puyol fouled Nesta before Nesta took down Busquets. It's a free kick to Milan, no doubt. Though shocker, nobody sees the Barca fouls, what a surprise - Nesta/Busquets also wouldn't have gone to ground had Puyol not made the foul. So to give that over the Puyol foul is quite a laughable decision. But this is Barca we're talking about. Hell, Fabregas even had his arm accross Ambro's face early in the game THEN Ambro won the ball and he still gives Cesc the free kick. No bias from the refs though. Haha, "no doubt".....err did you just watch the analysis at half-time, pictures are so clear. Nesta has got hold of Busquets long before Puyol fouls Nesta. Puyol DOES foul Nesta but by that time, Nesta had already lost Busquets and was holding his shirt. Wait the Fabregas one where Ambrosini was pulling him back? LOL. Incredible. No bias from the refs? Err what about the penalties in the first leg they didn't get? Wow. :| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted April 3, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted April 3, 2012 I wouldn't say the second was stonewall. But I can see why he gave it. And I disagree that the Puyol foul was first. nesta had hold of the shirt before the ball was even kicked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted April 3, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted April 3, 2012 Both were stone wall penalties. Puyol fouled Nesta before Nesta took down Busquets. It's a free kick to Milan, no doubt. Though shocker, nobody sees the Barca fouls, what a surprise - Nesta/Busquets also wouldn't have gone to ground had Puyol not made the foul. So to give that over the Puyol foul is quite a laughable decision. But this is Barca we're talking about. Hell, Fabregas even had his arm accross Ambro's face early in the game THEN Ambro won the ball and he still gives Cesc the free kick. No bias from the refs though. Haha, "no doubt".....err did you just watch the analysis at half-time, pictures are so clear. Nesta has got hold of Busquets long before Puyol fouls Nesta. Puyol DOES foul Nesta but by that time, Nesta had already lost Busquets and was holding his shirt. No bias from the refs? Err what about the penalties in the first leg they didn't get? Wow. :| They don't count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted April 3, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted April 3, 2012 I'd also question why a dutch referee would be bias towards Barca? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Haha, "no doubt".....err did you just watch the analysis at half-time, pictures are so clear. Nesta has got hold of Busquets long before Puyol fouls Nesta. Puyol DOES foul Nesta but by that time, Nesta had already lost Busquets and was holding his shirt. all this before the ball came back into play so technically ref shouldnt have restarted game. Even as bad as them demanding a red card for Antonini after 10 minutes. Hate Barcelona players they are a bunch of hypocrites as they then threw a tantrum when was suggested Xavi get booked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Nesta/Busquets also wouldn't have gone to ground had Puyol not made the foul. Busquets would've went down regardless. Stupid from Nesta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFC-Prideofbrum Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Now that looked a penalty, although one replay doesn't help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtsimonw Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Haha, "no doubt".....err did you just watch the analysis at half-time, pictures are so clear. Nesta has got hold of Busquets long before Puyol fouls Nesta. Puyol DOES foul Nesta but by that time, Nesta had already lost Busquets and was holding his shirt. Err what about the penalties in the first leg they didn't get? Wow. :| Think you'll find it's not a free kick for holding someones shirt, it's impeding their chance to get to the ball. Ball came into play as Puyol fouled Nesta. Er... what about the penalty they did get in the group stage for a Xavi dive? Not entirely sure what matters? What about the goal Milan had wrongly disallowed at the weekend, does the ref have to make that up for Milan here too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts