sidcow Posted September 16, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted September 16, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, foreveryoung said: So whats it all about? Should he not be arrested and criminal charges brought against him. An why has it took 20 years for this to come out? I haven't read all the details, but make you hope we have all treated women like princesses in our life, cause I doubt almost any of us are safe. Edited September 16, 2023 by sidcow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 5 minutes ago, DCJonah said: Yes. You responded to my post about the GB News tweet. Yes but you didn't read it properly as i went into detail what kind of interview i would like brand to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 3 minutes ago, sidcow said: Give it up will you. I watching the doc right now, one thing I wouldn't do is chat to Jimmy Saville. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAuthority Posted September 16, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted September 16, 2023 It seems there isn't any more in the doc than there was in the Times article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 Is anyone else reading Celebrity Sandals as a thread title? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 1 minute ago, TheAuthority said: It seems there isn't any more in the doc than there was in the Times article. So whats the point of the documentary then if we know everything? Surely the documentary will have more in depth info? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post sidcow Posted September 16, 2023 VT Supporter Popular Post Share Posted September 16, 2023 1 hour ago, foreveryoung said: Just going off the narrative, I forgot the VT rules of staying on it and agreeing with everything. **** me. Have you been in the music threads? The Politics threads? On Topic? People on here disagree and argue about all sorts of things all the time. You constantly throw this one out there, usually after you've come out with some comments that would be more suitable on the Andrew Tate twitter pages. What exactly the **** do you expect when posting veiled comments that we've all mistreated women in the past so it's OK. What response do you think you're going to get? 11 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAuthority Posted September 16, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted September 16, 2023 1 minute ago, Demitri_C said: So whats the point of the documentary then if we know everything? Surely the documentary will have more in depth info? People digest media in different ways. Some watch docs, some read newspapers. It was also a joint investigation by both outlets 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 3 minutes ago, TheAuthority said: People digest media in different ways. Some watch docs, some read newspapers. It was also a joint investigation by both outlets I think the documentary will give us abit more detail. Ill watch it still Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 11 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: Yes but you didn't read it properly as i went into detail what kind of interview i would like brand to do What did you think of the interview Prince Andrew did? He wasn't charged. Are you on his side? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leemond2008 Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 All in all, I think that shows that Brand is a an absolute gobshite who abused his position of power but there isn't any stone cold evidence to back the claims up aside from the medical records and one text message, both of which can pretty easily be explained away if you want to continue to support him. I doubt if he will be getting the lawyers on the case because you would expect the makers of this program and the writers of the article to have everything absolutely watertight, plus the longer that this stays in the public the more potential victims that will come forward and he won't want that, my guess is that he'll lie low for a while and slowly return to his youtube shenanigans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkyvilla Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 7 minutes ago, leemond2008 said: All in all, I think that shows that Brand is a an absolute gobshite who abused his position of power but there isn't any stone cold evidence to back the claims up aside from the medical records and one text message, both of which can pretty easily be explained away if you want to continue to support him. I doubt if he will be getting the lawyers on the case because you would expect the makers of this program and the writers of the article to have everything absolutely watertight, plus the longer that this stays in the public the more potential victims that will come forward and he won't want that, my guess is that he'll lie low for a while and slowly return to his youtube shenanigans. Probably won't even have to lie low for a while, he will probably get millions more followers out of it and lord it up because he's a massive word removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 Literally piles of proof and the main takeaway for his followers and the right wing grift job is that it’s a hit piece. Post-truth age 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 11 minutes ago, DCJonah said: What did you think of the interview Prince Andrew did? He wasn't charged. Are you on his side? No idea why your throwing random people in the mix unless your trying to provoke a controversial response but yo answer your question I didnt watch the interview and no im not on his side very wierd question to ask. Im not sure how you have to come to the conclusion "im on anyones side" As you dont read my posts ill just repeat until he is he trialled and we see what the actual evidence is in court (if it gets there) i wont tarnish him guilty yet. If he has done these heinous crimes then he rightly should do jail time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted September 16, 2023 Moderator Share Posted September 16, 2023 44 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: Another one is oscar pistorius. Did you think he was guilty @NurembergVillan ? Doesn't matter what I think, he's in jail for his crimes. Obviously, I didn't attend the trial, but from the limited amount of information I had, the verdict didn't come as a surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, Demitri_C said: No idea why your throwing random people in the mix unless your trying to provoke a controversial response but yo answer your question I didnt watch the interview and no im not on his side very wierd question to ask. Im not sure how you have to come to the conclusion "im on anyones side" As you dont read my posts ill just repeat until he is he trialled and we see what the actual evidence is in court (if it gets there) i wont tarnish him guilty yet. If he has done these heinous crimes then he rightly should do jail time So if he’s never taken to trial because the women don’t want to press charges, he’s done nothing wrong? why does it need to go to court to see the evidence? It’s in both the times article and in the channel 4 programme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted September 16, 2023 Moderator Share Posted September 16, 2023 1 minute ago, Demitri_C said: No idea why your throwing random people in the mix TBF, you've just lobbed a South African murderer into the conversation so Prince Andrew is as good as anyone. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, NurembergVillan said: Doesn't matter what I think, he's in jail for his crimes. Obviously, I didn't attend the trial, but from the limited amount of information I had, the verdict didn't come as a surprise. If it doesn't matter what you think why did you ask you ask me about OJ and MJ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 1 minute ago, Demitri_C said: No idea why your throwing random people in the mix unless your trying to provoke a controversial response but yo answer your question I didnt watch the interview and no im not on his side very wierd question to ask. Im not sure how you have to come to the conclusion "im on anyones side" As you dont read my posts ill just repeat until he is he trialled and we see what the actual evidence is in court (if it gets there) i wont tarnish him guilty yet. If he has done these heinous crimes then he rightly should do jail time He's not random. He's another high profile person accused of things who hasn't been charged. He also had the chance to defend himself in an unbiased interview. All the things you've gone on about. I was interested in what you thought about his accusations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, NurembergVillan said: TBF, you've just lobbed a South African murderer into the conversation so Prince Andrew is as good as anyone. Just like you did with the two examples above. Thats ok then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts