NurembergVillan Posted September 16, 2023 Moderator Share Posted September 16, 2023 21 minutes ago, foreveryoung said: I doubt anyone on here cannot say they have not mistreated a women in there life, how ever minor it was. But we're talking about the alleged rapes of multiple women here, not "accidentally" forgetting to record Cheshire Housewives. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loxstock92 Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 3 minutes ago, NurembergVillan said: TBF, you've just lobbed a South African murderer into the conversation so Prince Andrew is as good as anyone 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted September 16, 2023 Moderator Share Posted September 16, 2023 3 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: Just like you did with the two examples above. Thats ok then? Yeah it is. Your Pistorius question was fine too. As was the reference to Prince Andrew. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 4 minutes ago, StefanAVFC said: So if he’s never taken to trial because the women don’t want to press charges, he’s done nothing wrong? why does it need to go to court to see the evidence? It’s in both the times article and in the channel 4 programme. On top of this, based on the above I presume in your view mason greenwood is totally innocent too? As he wasn’t charged? Even though there is written and recorded evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 3 minutes ago, DCJonah said: He's not random. He's another high profile person accused of things who hasn't been charged. He also had the chance to defend himself in an unbiased interview. All the things you've gone on about. I was interested in what you thought about his accusations. Do you think he was guilty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted September 16, 2023 Moderator Share Posted September 16, 2023 5 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: If it doesn't matter what you think why did you ask you ask me about OJ and MJ? I didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, NurembergVillan said: Yeah it is. Your Pistorius question was fine too. As was the reference to Prince Andrew. Oh ok i thought you wasnt happy with that question hence why i probed =] 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted September 16, 2023 Moderator Share Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, Demitri_C said: Do you think he was guilty? He paid the victim c.£13m. Do you think he was innocent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leemond2008 Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, Demitri_C said: Oh ok i thought you wasnt happy with that question hence why i probed =] Be careful with that, you'll have channel 4 sniffing around you 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 1 minute ago, NurembergVillan said: I didn't. Apologies just looking back it wasnt you Just now, NurembergVillan said: He paid the victim c.£13m. Do you think he was innocent? Hell no! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: Do you think he was guilty? Do you think Mason Greenwood did nothing wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, leemond2008 said: Be careful with that, you'll have channel 4 sniffing around you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted September 16, 2023 Moderator Share Posted September 16, 2023 1 minute ago, Demitri_C said: Hell no! So a genuine question from me here, Dem - If you're presuming Prince Andrew is guilty despite not having faced a jury, why does Brand get the opposite verdict despite seemingly irrefutable evidence? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 It’s fascinating seeing the same far right grifters who attacked Huw Edwards despite a lack of trial defend Brand here. Even then, in the Huw Edwards case everything was consensual. The worst thing there was a man cheating on his wife. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 23 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: Do you think he was guilty? Absolutely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted September 16, 2023 Moderator Share Posted September 16, 2023 Add Michael Barrymore to the list of high-profile Brand defenders 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 (edited) 22 minutes ago, NurembergVillan said: So a genuine question from me here, Dem - If you're presuming Prince Andrew is guilty despite not having faced a jury, why does Brand get the opposite verdict despite seemingly irrefutable evidence? Because he paid them off, and he refused to go to court. Was friends with epstein. How much more shit do yoh need to be guilty? There was absolutely no way a member of royal family is going prison. With brand these are new allegations i havent seen the evidence to convict him. I mean can you say brands 100% guilty? He needs to be trialled. I mean if keir starmer was accused of the same charges wouldnt you agree he deserves a fair trial? Edited September 16, 2023 by Demitri_C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, NurembergVillan said: Add Michael Barrymore to the list of high-profile Brand defenders Whats he said? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 Just now, Demitri_C said: Because he paid them off, and he refused to go to court. Was friends with epstein. How much more shot do yoh need to be guilty? With brand these are new allegations i havent seen the evidence to convict him. I mean can you say brands 100% guilty? He needs to be trialled. I mean if keir starmer was accused of the same charges wouldnt you agree he deserves a fair trial? Why are you continually talking about a trial? Nobody has pressed charges against him. They have their reasons for that, probably similar reasons to why charges weren’t pursued against Mason Greenwood despite audio evidence and pictures of his abuse. I’ll ask again, did Mason Greenwood do nothing wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 1 hour ago, Demitri_C said: Because he paid them off, and he refused to go to court. Was friends with epstein. How much more shit do yoh need to be guilty? There was absolutely no way a member of royal family is going prison. With brand these are new allegations i havent seen the evidence to convict him. I mean can you say brands 100% guilty? He needs to be trialled. I mean if keir starmer was accused of the same charges wouldnt you agree he deserves a fair trial? Regardless of whether any of this ever goes to trial you can still have your own opinion on whether you believe all these woman are being truthful in their stories about his past behaviour or are all lying anonymously to the media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts