mikeyp102 Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 3 hours ago, chrisp65 said: Have we established yet the cut off age that’s an acceptable age for paying for porn rather than using the free stuff? This feels like one of those hilarious discussions where someone in their 20’s suddenly realises but can’t accept that old people still shag. I’m intrigued in who actually pays for porn, when you can get it all free 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted July 13, 2023 Share Posted July 13, 2023 2 minutes ago, mikeyp102 said: I’m intrigued in who actually pays for porn, when you can get it all free Somebody upstream asked a question about paying for porn and it made me think, had I ever paid. Then I remembered the olden times when you had to go to a different part of town and buy a jazz mag. That then made me wonder what had happened to the jazz mag industry and I’ve since found myself checking out the top shelf in shops, and I think that industry has disappeared. I don’t doubt there’s still more niche stuff in hobby shops, but it looks to me like everyday newsagent porn has gone. They needed a campaign, like the old ‘home taping is killing music’. ’phone wanking is killing jazz mags’ 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rds1983 Posted July 13, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted July 13, 2023 5 hours ago, foreveryoung said: Okay I won't look anymore, pass me your 18 year old daughters (if you had one), number and I'll ask her to send me some nudies for £500 so I can polish my rocket. Or would you rather I just browse the inter web, for randoms. Admitted they are possibly both immoral, but I would say one is worse then the other. A lot has been said by posters such as @Mark Albrighton or @Stevo985 since you quoted me and they've said most of what I would have. One thing I would add though is that even in your imaginary scenario, it doesn't really matter what my thoughts on it would be. If my imaginary 18 year old daughter was selling her nudes to 60 year old men, it doesn't matter if I don't like it. Neither of them would be braking the law and they're both consenting adults who can do what they like, no matter how I or anyone else felt about it. I'm also fully aware of the fact that when I was about that age that I did plenty of things that my parents would have objections to if they knew. Some legal, some not. Including actually sleeping with women about 20/25 year's older than me, which is probably worse than anything that appears to have happened here but at the time I wasn't condemned for it. For me to condemn people engaging in morally questionable but ultimately legal activities would make me a hypocritic. I'd argue there's a hell of a lot of people on here who would also did some dodgy things when they were young. Quick question for you though, when you turn 60 are you only going to watch porn of 50 year old woman? Where would your own morally acceptable line be? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seat68 Posted July 13, 2023 Author Share Posted July 13, 2023 59 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: I had sympathy with him at first but the more i read the more it was dodgey to me. It definitely for me aounded like he commited a grooming affair. How he hasnt been investigated properly ill never know. What are the facts you know. The facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomav84 Posted July 13, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted July 13, 2023 18 minutes ago, Rds1983 said: A lot has been said by posters such as @Mark Albrighton or @Stevo985 since you quoted me and they've said most of what I would have. One thing I would add though is that even in your imaginary scenario, it doesn't really matter what my thoughts on it would be. If my imaginary 18 year old daughter was selling her nudes to 60 year old men, it doesn't matter if I don't like it. Neither of them would be braking the law and they're both consenting adults who can do what they like, no matter how I or anyone else felt about it. I'm also fully aware of the fact that when I was about that age that I did plenty of things that my parents would have objections to if they knew. Some legal, some not. Including actually sleeping with women about 20/25 year's older than me, which is probably worse than anything that appears to have happened here but at the time I wasn't condemned for it. For me to condemn people engaging in morally questionable but ultimately legal activities would make me a hypocritic. I'd argue there's a hell of a lot of people on here who would also did some dodgy things when they were young. Quick question for you though, when you turn 60 are you only going to watch porn of 50 year old woman? Where would your own morally acceptable line be? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 14, 2023 Share Posted July 14, 2023 10 hours ago, Seat68 said: What are the facts you know. The facts. His brothers a paedo and in prison he knew was a paedo and didnt go to the police. Then a story comes out about his appropriate behaviour with a person younger than 16. Hope thats enough facts for you. Its not like things havent been covered up eg jimmy saville. Another fact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seat68 Posted July 14, 2023 Author Share Posted July 14, 2023 10 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: His brothers a paedo and in prison he knew was a paedo and didnt go to the police. Then a story comes out about his appropriate behaviour with a person younger than 16. Hope thats enough facts for you. Its not like things havent been covered up eg jimmy saville. Another fact The only known fact at this point is his brother is a paedophile, in prison and once told he didn't go to the police. The only element of that which could be laid at Schofield's feet is that he didn't go to the police. There is no story about his inappropriate behaviour with an underage male. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 14, 2023 Share Posted July 14, 2023 Just now, Seat68 said: The only known fact at this point is his brother is a paedophile, in prison and once told he didn't go to the police. The only element of that which could be laid at Schofield's feet is that he didn't go to the police. There is no story about his inappropriate behaviour with an underage male. Exactly thats what im sayjng seat why hasnt there been? Because he did a interview on tv talking about his mental health? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted July 14, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 14, 2023 12 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: His brothers a paedo and in prison he knew was a paedo and didnt go to the police. Then a story comes out about his appropriate behaviour with a person younger than 16. Hope thats enough facts for you. Its not like things havent been covered up eg jimmy saville. Another fact Well no not quite, the inappropriate behaviour with a minor only became inappropriate in retrospect when the minor was older as far as we know. Sure it’s possible it was inappropriate early but that isn’t a fact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 14, 2023 Share Posted July 14, 2023 1 minute ago, bickster said: Well no not quite, the inappropriate behaviour with a minor only became inappropriate in retrospect when the minor was older as far as we know. Sure it’s possible it was inappropriate early but that isn’t a fact Quite, im merely pointing out why hasnt it been investigated further? Huw appears to have done less than schofield and its been a witch hunt on him. Huw doesn't seem to be a media darling. All im interested in is justice for wrong doing and appropriate action on those individuals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted July 14, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 14, 2023 2 minutes ago, Demitri_C said: Quite, im merely pointing out why hasnt it been investigated further? How do you know it hasn’t? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 14, 2023 Share Posted July 14, 2023 1 minute ago, bickster said: How do you know it hasn’t? How do we know it has? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted July 14, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 14, 2023 Just now, Demitri_C said: How do we know it has? The only person that really needs to know this is the apparent victim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Davkaus Posted July 16, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted July 16, 2023 On 09/07/2023 at 18:19, trekka said: Hahahahaha https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/jeremy-vine-libel-bbc-huw-edwards-b2376215.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1689524201 Quote Jeremy Vine has received a libel pay-out from a Twitter user who wrongly claimed he was at the centre of the latest BBC scandal. The BBC Radio 2 presenter’s name was one of several to trend on social media last weekend after The Sun published a story claiming that an unnamed BBC presenter had paid £35,000 to a young person, over a three-year period, in exchange for sexually explicit images. Huw Edwards was later revealed by his wife as the person at the centre of the story, but not before Vine was misidentified as the presenter online. “On 8 July @AndyPlumb4 libelled me by alleging that I was the BBC presenter at the heart of a story in The Sun that day,” Vine wrote on Twitter on Sunday (16 July). “He has now acknowledged that he was wrong, and has apologised. At my request, he has also agreed to pay £1,000 to [motor neurone disease association] @mndassoc rather than paying damages.” Plumb, who describes himself as a “patriot and proud Brit” who doesn’t “do small talk” on his Twitter profile, made a public apology to Vine and said his “defamatory” statement about the broadcaster was “entirely baseless”. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodders0223 Posted July 17, 2023 Share Posted July 17, 2023 On 13/07/2023 at 22:25, Rds1983 said: Quick question for you though, when you turn 60 are you only going to watch porn of 50 year old woman? Where would your own morally acceptable line be? 33, the same as when i was 13! Milf hunter was my jam then and it will be when I'm 60. Huw Edwards is a filthy old rotter 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 24, 2023 Share Posted July 24, 2023 Seems to have disappeared off the news now hasnt it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted July 25, 2023 Share Posted July 25, 2023 12 hours ago, Demitri_C said: Seems to have disappeared off the news now hasnt it? Because it was never a story to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 25, 2023 Share Posted July 25, 2023 6 minutes ago, StefanAVFC said: Because it was never a story to begin with. It clearly was as it dominating the news. Now he has been named and shamed its gone. Schofield another that disappears off the news Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted July 25, 2023 Share Posted July 25, 2023 Just now, Demitri_C said: It clearly was as it dominating the news. Now he has been named and shamed its gone. Schofield another that disappears off the news It was dominating the news on completely false pretenses, that 1) the 'victim' was underage and 2) the 'victim' was the one reporting it to authorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 25, 2023 Share Posted July 25, 2023 1 minute ago, StefanAVFC said: It was dominating the news on completely false pretenses, that 1) the 'victim' was underage and 2) the 'victim' was the one reporting it to authorities. As soon as mental health was mentioned it disappeared just like schofield If andrew tate (whether you like his views or not) said his mental health was in jeopardy would this disappear on the news too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts