Jump to content

The now-enacted will of (some of) the people


blandy

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Dr_Pangloss said:

Referendums are the practice of an idiocracy. 

Oh yah few years ago we had a referendum in my country lithuania about foreigners buying our land.Referendum initiators nationalists pro russians anti EU people made arguments that if we sell land to eu citizen from germany that is not lithuanias land but germanys or smth stupid like that. The whole thing was to sabotage our eu membership because not selling land to eu citizen would contradict eu rules. We would be getting fines from eu or even drop out of eu. The whole thing was very big because if you do referendum in lithuania you have to collect 300 000 signatures its huge in country where we have 2.5 milion people. 

Our former resident Landsbergis was in debate show with referendum initiators and i will never forget what he told them. He said you making these referendums and votes without fully understanding the consequences.Then you ask our goverment to fix the whole mess you put us in  and if our goverment dont fix the whole mess and dont fix it quickly you will get angry and you will protest and you will want to overthrow whole goverment.

The whole thing was surreal and that referendum failed and if i hear referendum im becoming super nervous because theres a lot of stupid people you will never know.

Edited by Tumblerseven
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tumblerseven said:

making these referendums and votes without fully understanding the consequences.Then u ask our goverment to fix the whole mess u put us in  and if our goverment dont fix the whole mess and dont fix it quickly u will get angry and u will protest and u will want to overthrow whole goverment.

That's a wise thing to say. Whoever is the next Government in the Uk is going to get a massive amount of flak for whatever the end result of Brexit is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, OutByEaster? said:

*Edit - a look through the places I'd normally look finds nothing, if I can find it, I'll come back to you.*

Is it the indicative votes thing that's talked about in this article?

Quote

...

Reports emerged this morning that de-facto deputy Prime Minister David Lidington is urging fellow Cabinet members to back a series of “indicative votes” in the Commons.

The options would include the PM’s deal, quitting the EU without a deal, leaving on the same terms as Norway or holding a fresh Brexit referendum - which Mr Lidington is said to believe would win the day.

...

Elsewhere, Education Secretary Damian Hinds also refused to rule out an “indicative votes” process to break the deadlock - arguing going through the options would win MPs over to the PM’s deal.

He told Sky News this morning: “People need to get beyond everybody’s idea of ‘what’s my first choice’ because there isn’t a majority for any of those first choices.”

He added that MPs needed to take a “balanced kind of approach” by eliminating the options based on whether they are workable or have support in the Commons.

According to the Sunday Times, Mr Lidington and Mr Hinds are among six Cabinet ministers pushing the “indicative votes” plan amid a split at the top of Government over whether there should be a second referendum.

...

I certainly don't think it's a bad idea to have Parliament look at and vote on all of the options but I can't see the government (for which read Mrs May) going for it.

If these votes were to happen then there ought to be a clear indication of the process for taking them in to consideration before they happen. Unfortunately, much like the first referendum, any future referendum, the various votes on various parts of the Brexit process in Parliament, &c. I doubt there would be. We'd probably just see arguments about what these votes meant after they'd taken place which would just use up more time.

Edited by snowychap
Forgot the link in the initial post
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mjmooney said:

If there is another referendum and 'remain' isn't an option, I won't be voting. 

From what I can see moon man, there would possibly be 3 options:

1. Remain in EU

2. Maybot's hashed deal

3. No deal

I can only see remain winning in that scenario 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon said:

From what I can see moon man, there would possibly be 3 options:

1. Remain in EU

2. Maybot's hashed deal

3. No deal

I can only see remain winning in that scenario 

No no, you forgot the Labour Deal they haven't negotiated but will be campaigning for anyway. Absolute spanners

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chindie said:

The 'People's Vote' thing is just marketing. They did some research and apparently that played most successfully. One of the big figures behind the campaign actually prefers 'Final Say' but that is less successful in the marketing

It's really shit marketing IMO. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mjmooney said:

If there is another referendum and 'remain' isn't an option, I won't be voting. 

I would argue the spoilt paper with remain scrawled on it is the only solution to that conundrum

Abstentionism in this particular instance legitimises the opposing view by default

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bickster said:

you forgot the Labour Deal they haven't negotiated but will be campaigning for anyway. Absolute spanners

No, No, let me be very clear. What Labour has said is that May's proposed deal, which involves an initial bag o'shite, followed by a transition period, will be voted down and then Labour will use the transition period, which will have been voted down and thus not exist, to re-negotiate so that the bag o' shite which is such because the EU won't allow their rules to be exempted for a third state (the UK), by asking the EU to exempt their rules for a third state, (the UK). It will be a jobs first Brexit, in which the same contradictions the tories have will miraculously not count anymore, because Jeremy's got a potting shed and isn't an immigration obsessed Maidstone numpty, but is instead an Islington numpty with a penchant for 1970s bedsit revolutionaries.

What could possibly go wrong?

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Jon said:

From what I can see moon man, there would possibly be 3 options:

1. Remain in EU

2. Maybot's hashed deal

3. No deal

I can only see remain winning in that scenario 

It's tough to design it in a way that isn't incredibly flawed. My initial thought it it'd need to be a 2 part question.

Do you want to leave or remain.

If you want to leave, how, May's deal, or no deal.

But even then, if Leave wins slightly, and it's a narrow margin for no deal, it may well be that even the people that voted leave with May's deal don't want to crash out.

Just the 3 options seems a bit flawed though. Look at the Villa badge questionnaire. Most of us wanted Aston Villa or Aston Villa FC, by a clear margin, but we ended up with AVFC. 

Edited by Davkaus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davkaus said:

It'd need to be a 2 part question, IMO.

Do you want to leave or remain.

If you want to leave, how, May's deal, or no deal.

Single Transferable Vote is the best / most democratic option. Two-stage questions are meaningless and over complicated

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some damage is done by this referendum and activation of article 50. If Uk stays i personaly would like to see your veto gone and you taking the euro i think that would be reasonable because by these actions you weakened EU and euro you are disruptive element in the union.

Do you guys think that would be reasonable or no?

Edited by Tumblerseven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tumblerseven said:

I think some damage is done by this referendum and activation of article 50. If Uk stays i personaly would like to see your veto gone and u taking the euro i think that would be reasonable because by these actions u weakened EU and euro u are disruptive element in the union.

Do u guys think that would be reasonable or no?

If we stay, we stay on the terms we currently have, so the veto will remain

If we leave and rejoin at a later date the veto will be gone and we'll have to adopt the Euro

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I read somewhere yesterday is that Scottish Conservatives are thinking of openly pushing for another referendum. They favour two questions, first is the most important "Brexit or no brexit?" and the second "May's deal or not May's deal?". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â