Some people just have an agenda.
Some people don’t understand that sometimes doing a job for your team is more important than doing a job for yourself.
Some people will see a cat, and argue that it’s a dog day after day after day, and no matter what they are told, nothing will change their mind.
It is easier to smile and wave at these people, and just carry on with your life.
Now obviously using statistics alone is not necessarily the most accurate way to judge a player. And obviously it is very much dependent on algorithms used. What I would say though is that at-least it is based on a consistent, un-prejudiced way to make an assessment.
so:
About WhoScored.com Ratings
Our player ratings are based on each event recorded in the game calculated live automatically using our own algorithms, which comprise over 200 raw statistics. All events are valued based on a researched perception of the effect on the outcome on the match. Positive events are valued against negative events.
A statistical analysis suggests:
Do I think he was man of the match? No.
But do I think I’d give more value to their statistical non-prejudiced assessment than some dude on the internet that posts anti-Buendia stuff at regular 6 minute intervals?