Jump to content

MessiWillSignForVilla

Established Member
  • Posts

    3,081
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MessiWillSignForVilla

  1. Bridgen embarrassing his constituency again, must be lunchtime. God I can't wait until that word removed is no longer my MP.
  2. New FIFA rules mean that players can switch allegiance once if they have played no more than 3 competitive games (and 0 tournament games) for their nation prior to the age of 21. The rule is designed to stop bigger international teams from giving young players with dual nationalities caps just to lock down their future elligibility, i.e. El Ghazi with the Netherlands, Zaha with England.
  3. A roll of tape that has the word Balenciaga on it repeated over and over being cut off and reading as "Ba-" "-alenciaga" seems like something that could easily happen by coincidence. Not to mention the sacrificing kids to Baal thing comes from a Roman source discussing the Carthaginians, it'd be like someone digging up WW1 propaganda in 2000 years and coming to the conclusion that Germans were a huge ape-like creature.
  4. I feel this is often overlooked when discussing Georgia, and it's forgotten that Italy weren't allowed to join the 5 Nations just because they were best of the rest, between 95-99 they record wins against Ireland (x3), Argentina* (x2), France and Scotland, they got invited because they started regularly beating T1 nations (not sure if Argentina would've counted as T1 at the time however). If Georgia can continue this and get a few more wins, then it might be worth adding them to an expanded 6 Nations.
  5. Funnily enough when Utd fans froth over how much of a thug he is for that (which I also think was accidental btw), they forget to mention that Ibrahimovic just elbowed him in the head for no reason earlier in that game. Whilst I agree with most of your post, I think the Ibrahimovic incident is where it basically all stems from, ever since Utd and Ibrahimovic fans, and to an extent other Top 6 fans, have tripped over themselves to declare that Mings is a talentless thug despite clearly never watching him play, and the sheer volume of those comments has steered public opinion, you hear he's a clearing in the woods enough times without seeing him play you end up just believing it.
  6. The follow up tweets that state why are insane How are the employees gonna sabotage it, by improving the site instead of gutting it?
  7. There's supposedly an accusation that Checo crashed in Monaco on purpose to secure P3 in qualifying.
  8. Olsen is diving like Dad's do when they concede their toddler's shot.
  9. Clever, albeit risky, defending from Mings, just enough to put Rashford off balance
  10. Well he's only had one straight red his entire career, so two?
  11. Of course you would, you realised no-one else would touch you with a ten foot barge pole. Prick.
  12. I was 1 the last time we won at home against these. 27 years of spirited losses, bullshit refereeing and flukey goals, it feels so **** good to beat these cheating **** bastards! Emery is a God!
  13. Haha, Hendrie barely talking on comms now, you can tell he's played in these games a few times!
  14. After the "You won't win anything with kids" game the FA struck a deal with Utd to never let them lose at VP again
  15. Watkins has been magnificent today, reckon he'll fit Emery's system beautifully
  16. I feel horrible, we could be battering these 10-0 and I'd be convinced they could come back 10-11. At least it's good to feel something about Villa again though
  17. I get the feeling that Norwich fans are a little entitled and expect to walk the Championship whenever they get relegated, anything less is terrible.
  18. It's a great example of why players dive, no way he gets a penalty if he doesn't go down even though he was blatantly kicked by Robinson.
  19. I'm not normally one for the whole you can't criticise someone who's better than you argument, and I get this is TalkSport's schtick, but who the **** are Jermaine Pennant and Jamie O'Hara to be debating whether Pique is one of the greatest defenders ever!? Personally I would probably say he isn't, but to be so dismissive of it is ridiculous, you make the argument by saying he's not as good as Maldini or Nesta or Barini or Beckenbauer or Moore or McGrath and so on, not by just going "yeah well he played with good players", then how come both of you looked so shit?
  20. Oh I know, but that's the elephant in the room with Musk justification for sacking so much staff, that's why I was laughing at it. He'd rather people believe he sunk $44bn into a company that was losing $1.2bn per year instead of realising that his purchase increased Twitter's losses by $1bn per year. Either way, it doesn't make him look like a great businessman! There is an argument that Twitter was just about to reach profitability before the pandemic as it had two profit making years in a row, the only ones in their history, but it's hard to say how much the pandemic truly effected them and whether they would bounce back from it, but as with all tech companies, it was massively overinflated in price when Musk made the offer to buy it, so even then it wasn't really worth it.
  21. I think one of my favourite things about twitter at the minute is the amount of blue checks sacrificing their accounts to hammer home the point to Musk that the verification process is there for Twitter's benefit, not the user's. I also saw a fairly serious thread about it from an actor whose name I can't remember now (Robert something, he's got a Jewish/Eastern European sounding last name and was in Eastenders and the Warcraft movie), talking about how before he used social media he got contacted by parents whose 11-15 year old kids had been talking to "him" online and that one of them even went missing, so he signed up to every platform he could to make an official account he could control and point to as the real him, preventing people using his name as a way to groom kids. The "value" of the blue check is simply to prove someone is who they say they are, so Twitter can both claim to have the real X on their site whilst also defending themselves from potential legal action that they are allowing people to defame X by posing as them on Twitter. Why would someone pay for the privilege of helping Twitter?
×
×
  • Create New...
Â