ender4 Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 slightly steep, but he'll only serve 2.75 years, and probably less once he appeals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddywhack Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Someone just came in the cubicle next to me and by the sounds of it emptied a large jar of pickled eggs into the toilet. They flushed after about 5 seconds and left. They was in there a maximum of 45 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 One for legov The 'haze' was smoke blowing across from illegal wildfires on Sumatra. http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=81431 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastEndVillan Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 So 5 1/2 years for Jeremy Forrest bonkers decision or the correct one ? Seems harsh compared to Stuart Hall's 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted June 21, 2013 Moderator Share Posted June 21, 2013 Someone just came in the cubicle next to me and by the sounds of it emptied a large jar of pickled eggs into the toilet. They flushed after about 5 seconds and left. They was in there a maximum of 45 seconds.Textbook. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddywhack Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 I'm a '15 minute' kind of guy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyh29 Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 A trip to the toilet without a smartphone of some description is just pointless isn't it ? some of my best scores have been achieved on the bog 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 It depends. Some mornings after a run and a coffee, it fires out. Other days it needs a bit of encouragement. Rarely have time to get some reading done but I haven't reached that stage in life just yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meath_Villan Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Someone just came in the cubicle next to me and by the sounds of it emptied a large jar of pickled eggs into the toilet. They flushed after about 5 seconds and left. They was in there a maximum of 45 seconds. Textbook. Probably didnt need to wipe it was that "clean" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted June 21, 2013 Moderator Share Posted June 21, 2013 I'm a '15 minute' kind of guy.Anyone who actually needs that long is either going before said deposit is truly ready to leave the building or else they have digestion issues. Probably didnt need to wipe it was that "clean"It's a brave man who makes that ASSumption though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddywhack Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 I'm a '15 minute' kind of guy. Anyone who actually needs that long is either going before said deposit is truly ready to leave the building or else they have digestion issues. I think it's because I like to make a meal of it, if you excuse the imagery. 15 minutes away from my desk, a few minutes on my phone, a nice big pick of the 'ole nostrils..etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted June 21, 2013 Moderator Share Posted June 21, 2013 Ok, so a paid vacation. Gotcha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted June 21, 2013 Author VT Supporter Share Posted June 21, 2013 Someone just came in the cubicle next to me Did you hear them groaning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddywhack Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Nah, just a well positioned mirror Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddywhack Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 Anyway, we're trying to have a serious conversation here, Stevo, stop being so disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 So 5 1/2 years for Jeremy Forrest bonkers decision or the correct one ? I think it's a bit steep. He's not a paedophile and not a child abuser. He abused a position of power and exploited the girl and that is unacceptable. Running away with her was born ur of fear but such a bad idea. Definitely worth a prison sentence, but maybe not 5.5 years. Really good article on it here though. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jeremy-forrest-girl-arent-romeo-1974467 He was a teacher in a position of authority and power over an underage girl he had sex with. In what way is he not a child abuser? The sentence is nowhere near long enough for the sick turd. Anyway, judging by yesterday's denial of wrong doing, he won't be getting out any time soon, I believe child abductiers and sex offenders need to repent before they can get out. He'll enjoy the VP wing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 (edited) Obviously by the letter of the law he is, because she was underage but it's hardly comparible to molesting children. By the same token, he's not a paedophile. You just can't place him in the bracket as somebody who has molested a young child (which I think you are but correct me if I'm wrong). He's incredibly stupid more than anything. Sick? Yes by abusing his position and taking advantage of her situation. I'm trying to think how to articulate what I'm trying to say but I'm in the car on my phone so finding it hard. Not defending what he's done because its wrong on so many levels, but the sentence is a tad harsh IMO. I'm just trying to look at it without the pre-labelled judgement of 'child abuser'. That article i posted is quite excellent in summarising the entire case. Edited June 21, 2013 by StefanAVFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted June 21, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted June 21, 2013 Agree with Stefan. This situation is as old as time, and is absolutely NOT comparable with child rape. They both should have known better, but hormones (both partners) occasionally overrule conscience in cases like this. But he was in a position of authority, and has to face the music to some degree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted June 21, 2013 Moderator Share Posted June 21, 2013 I think some people need to learn what the word paedophile actually means too. It's a pretty specific word rather than the all-encompassing term that it has become for anything involving underage sex. But that's just a general disgruntlement directed at poor or lazy vocabularies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarethRDR Posted June 21, 2013 Share Posted June 21, 2013 I believe he's actually a hebephile, not a paedophile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts