bickster Posted February 2, 2012 Moderator Share Posted February 2, 2012 I think we all smell a kipper three weeks past its sell by date, or is that Hawwy's dead more than a dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted February 2, 2012 Moderator Share Posted February 2, 2012 But who did the dog leave the cash to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legov Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Alright come on Arry quit Spuds for England now and leave them with that crop of ageing centrebacks you've brought in over the last few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted February 3, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted February 3, 2012 Was at my Mom's last night. We were watching the news, and the Redknapp story came on. he came on the screen and she declared "He's turned into a right fat slob of a man hasn't he?!" Yes he has, Mom. Yes he has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw63 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMFy Posted February 6, 2012 Share Posted February 6, 2012 Well, the moment is almost upon us. Could be a judgement tomorrow. I'm not convinced Redknapp has actually provided any reason for his actions, just tried to provide reasons he might not have done what the HMRC are alleging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 The jury are out considering their verdict. Anyone know how long they usually take for a case like this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted February 7, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted February 7, 2012 30 seconds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulieB Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Jury have been sent home as failed to reach a verdict as yet. Will have been a huge waste of tax payers money if he's found not guilty. However humiliation value must surely be factored into this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mockingbird_franklin Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Jury have been sent home as failed to reach a verdict as yet. Will have been a huge waste of tax payers money if he's found not guilty. However humiliation value must surely be factored into this. It will also provide proof that the buffoon defense is a potent and valid one or that your average Juror could well be a cretin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted February 7, 2012 Moderator Share Posted February 7, 2012 Three possible verdicts, not guilty, Mandaric guilty Kedknapp not, Mandaric and Redknapp both guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CI Posted February 7, 2012 Share Posted February 7, 2012 Will have been a huge waste of tax payers money if he's found not guilty. Tbh, millions are wasted on the legal system each week Having done jury service, I sat through a case for 6 days before the judge through it out! In reality, he could have done this in the first 30 mins or better still the CPS would never have brought it to a judge and jury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted February 8, 2012 Moderator Share Posted February 8, 2012 If he is found guilty it will be very interesting to see how he is treated by the press who have until now been his best buddies. Will they turn on him? Will they continue to think he can do or say no wrong? Will we see a rush of stories about him as so often happens when a high profile person loses a court case. I await the judgement with interest, on the balance of what I've heard I don't for one minute believe it was a loan so I think he is guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eames Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 The interesting development was that the judge will only accept unanimous verdicts. So one closet Spurs fan on the jury and the whole things a waste of time - I now believe the Jury will fail to reach the required verdict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
privateer Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 The interesting development was that the judge will only accept unanimous verdicts. So one closet Spurs fan on the jury and the whole things a waste of time - I now believe the Jury will fail to reach the required verdict. WTF? It looks like that word removed judge is determined candle face should walk. I've just read part of his summing up and it seemed to me he was being unduly favourable to the defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentVilla Posted February 8, 2012 Moderator Share Posted February 8, 2012 Highly likely they will fail to reach a conclusion then, bit of a farce really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodytom Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 Hopefully Henry Fondas on the jury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eames Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 The interesting development was that the judge will only accept unanimous verdicts. So one closet Spurs fan on the jury and the whole things a waste of time - I now believe the Jury will fail to reach the required verdict. WTF? It looks like that word removed judge is determined candle face should walk. I've just read part of his summing up and it seemed to me he was being unduly favourable to the defence. If you've only read part of the summing up its not really possible for you to come to that conclusion. If the case fails it will be because HMRC **** it up, not that the judge was biased. Unless there is a Spurs fan(s) on the Jury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CI Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 Must admit, I thought it was going to Court as the Crouch money was the "tip of the iceberg" and that a load more stuff would come out in Court It hasn't The two may face a small fine but at the end of the day why would a billionaire try and save £15k in tax and a multi millionaire a little over 30k ?? Both have great character references, probably donate shed loads to charities etc. They've not had a fair trial, let them go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bose Posted February 8, 2012 Share Posted February 8, 2012 He's been cleared of all charges. Laughable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts