Hindsight and all that!
I cant remember many people saying this at the time....or indeed anytime during that first year.
He benefited from an age defying Friedel, giving the club a rose tinted view of 40 year old keepers, along with the fact he was one of the most sought after in the division.
The wages were too high but we simply would not have got him had they not been offered, then who would we have got with THAT MANS scouting network?
The truth is he had a fantastic year for us that should have resulted in him being awarded POTY. Its such a pivotal position that if you take that on board there is an argument that we could have gone down without him.
Im like pretty much everyone else that I can see now what a cock up it was now, but to blame Learner for his decision at the time is simply wrong.