dont_do_it_doug. Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 I'd have him joint 2nd with xavi behind messi... He has it all You'd take Iniesta over Ronaldo, genuinely? Does not compute. I like Iniesta, I think he's brilliant. Just not quite as god like as often advertised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont_do_it_doug. Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Westwood has the potential to be better than JW Better than he is now? Possibly. If you're saying he has a higher ceiling I'm not having it. Wilshere just turned 20, his potential as I said before is in my opinion Fabregas' level. Westwoods potential is Jack Wilshere. That's not a knock on our lad at all. Means he's potentially good enough to play for England. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Better than he is now? Possibly. If you're saying he has a higher ceiling I'm not having it. Wilshere just turned 20, his potential as I said before is in my opinion Fabregas' level. Westwoods potential is Jack Wilshere. That's not a knock on our lad at all. Means he's potentially good enough to play for England. agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 World's best footballers: 100-41 No Jack Wilshere, yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Still to early, he is only 20 years old. Won't reach his peak for at least another 4 years. Very very promising player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swerbs Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 He'll be one of England's best players, just behind Rooney imo. Wont be anywhere near the world's best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troglodyte Posted December 22, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted December 22, 2012 I'd have him joint 2nd with xavi behind messi... He has it all You'd take Iniesta over Ronaldo, genuinely? Does not compute. I like Iniesta, I think he's brilliant. Just not quite as god like as often advertised. Iniesta over Ronaldo depends on the team. If your side already has Messi, I think Iniesta would be preferable to Ronaldo. Otherwise, you'd probably want Ronaldo. However, personally I'd rather watch Iniesta play that Ronaldo - he entertains me more. That's just a matter of personal preference though, as I'm sure others would choose to watch Ronaldo every time. There's a reason that Iniesta was voted as UEFA's player of the year, and is on the three-man shortlist for the Ballon d'Or. However, I guess that Ibrahimovic doesn't have the same opportunities to perform on an international level, as obviously the level of his team-mates is far below those of Iniesta. Still, I'd take Andrés over Zlatan any day, personally. But I do love Iniesta - he's up there on the 'men I want to hug' list - probably in the top three. Jürgen Klopp is miles out in front there, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Still to early, he is only 20 years old. Won't reach his peak for at least another 4 years. I meant yet as in they haven't published 40-1 yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 I meant yet as in they haven't published 40-1 yet. Ahh ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir_gary_cahill Posted December 22, 2012 Author Share Posted December 22, 2012 The boy is class, can't believe he's still only 20, feels like he's been around for ages Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 (edited) Won't reach his peak for at least another 4 years. Edited December 26, 2012 by AVFCforever1991 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir_gary_cahill Posted December 22, 2012 Author Share Posted December 22, 2012 Which shows how good he is now, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troglodyte Posted December 22, 2012 VT Supporter Share Posted December 22, 2012 Yup, that makes him at least as good as the current first choice central midfielders in the Spanish national team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Yeah that claim SGC was ridiculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seat68 Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Even being Englands best footballer, which Wilshere is never likely to be, isnt that still a bit tallest midget. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir_gary_cahill Posted December 26, 2012 Author Share Posted December 26, 2012 He is England's best footballer, hands down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PompeyVillan Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 No he's not. I'd rather have Carrick in midfield than Wilshere. He's average. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coda Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Carrick is shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PompeyVillan Posted December 27, 2012 Share Posted December 27, 2012 Carrick is shite. Nah, he isn't. Quality midfielder who England have no idea how to utilise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir_gary_cahill Posted December 27, 2012 Author Share Posted December 27, 2012 He's decent, nothing more than that, nowhere near the technical ability and football brain of Wilshere 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts