CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Categorisation is bollocks. Gender is best considered in terms a spectrum. You aren't one thing or the other. No one fits nicely into a neat little category. I'm tired of people applying labels to humans. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingram85 Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Anyone who wears a shirt with a crap picture of a semi naked lady on it, with a random few words and a meaningless year on it should be shot. Violently. In the face. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted November 3, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted November 3, 2013 Some people spend more time at one end (or the other) of the spectrum, though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingram85 Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Categorisation is bollocks. Gender is best considered in terms a spectrum. You aren't one thing or the other. No one fits nicely into a neat little category. I'm tired of people applying labels to humans. Your so gamma Ced. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted November 3, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted November 3, 2013 How could you shoot somebody NOT violently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villaajax Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Categorisation is bollocks. Gender is best considered in terms a spectrum. You aren't one thing or the other. No one fits nicely into a neat little category. I'm tired of people applying labels to humans. Your so gamma Ced. CEDs trying to come out as a hermaphrodite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingram85 Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 (edited) Edit: VA did a Stefan. Grrrrrr. Edited November 3, 2013 by Ingram85 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villaajax Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 How could you shoot somebody NOT violently? The best dictionary in the World, Oxford, defines violence as "Behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something:violence erupted in protest marches" So if it was done accidentally, perhaps that works? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xann Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 How could you shoot somebody NOT violently? Accidently? Get the first one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leviramsey Posted November 3, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted November 3, 2013 Nowt wrong with being a Beta, haven't got time for alpha males, they are the worst kind of people and are just nauseating, mindless bores who eventually will disappear to go and populate std ridden Mediterranean islands leaving the rest of society to get on with it. Crime, sales figures of golf gti's, football hooliganism, lads mags and River Island will probably cease to exist too.Most politicians are alpha males as well.Kill them with fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Pangloss Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 (edited) Categorisation is bollocks. Gender is best considered in terms a spectrum. You aren't one thing or the other. No one fits nicely into a neat little category. I'm tired of people applying labels to humans. Not, really, you're either one or the other. If you're not then you have some sort of mental disorder. *That was a joke by the way* Edited November 3, 2013 by Dr_Pangloss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villaguy Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Psychological profiles says more about the pre conceptions and psyche of the person who wrote it than it does about the subject Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 I have a T-shirt with Marilyn on but I quite like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingram85 Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Marilyn tbf is quite iconic. Much better than random bird with jugs out but wait, she's pulled a slither of shirt down over them. How clever and what's that say? 'Est. 1957'? Why is there Latin written underneath too? Oooooh that's so edgy. Hmmmmmm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villaajax Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Marilyn tbf is quite iconic. Much better than random bird with jugs out but wait, she's pulled a slither of shirt down over them. How clever and what's that say? 'Est. 1957'? Why is there Latin written underneath too? Oooooh that's so edgy. Hmmmmmm. How about fat men with 'Tapout' shirts? Not fooling anyone. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyh29 Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 (edited) How could you shoot somebody NOT violently?With a camera ? Edited November 3, 2013 by tonyh29 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyh29 Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 I have a T-shirt with Marilyn on but I quite like it.That's possibly the gheyist thing any man has written not just on VT but the entire interweb 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Really? Owning a t-shirt with Marilyn Monroe on, is gay? I'd suggest quite the opposite. It's not as if it's Gok Wan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villaajax Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 It is a bit gay to be fair. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xann Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 Which Marilyn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts