Jump to content

The banker loving, baby-eating Tory party thread (regenerated)


blandy

Recommended Posts

Cracking down on the scroungers

Quote

Today we received the terrible news that Stephen Smith had died.

Sadly most people will remember Stephen because of the truly harrowing pictures of his emaciated body published by the ECHO in February - and subsequently shared around the world.

No one could quite believe a man in his appalling physical condition could have been denied benefits, told to look for work - and forced to get a pass out of hospital to fight for the support he so badly needed and deserved.

Despite the increasing number of reports of desperate and vulnerable people being unfairly treated and humiliated by the pernicious welfare system that currently exists in this country, Stephen's was a case that stood out .

The images of his spine, so visible through his stretched, weak skin, will forever be held up as a symbol of why things need to change.

We appear to have moved away from a welfare state that seeks to support the country's most needy as its first port of call to one looking to save cash wherever possible - with more and more people slipping through the cracks.

We don't know the exact reasons behind Stephen's death at this stage and clearly he was a man with a number of serious health concerns. 

What we can safely say is that the endless months he spent fighting against what was so obviously an incorrect decision to deny him benefits and that saw him leave hospital - all six stone of him - to fight a tribunal, will not have made his difficult life any easier.

While those images of Stephen's withered body will remain scorched in the memory, it would be better to remember him as someone who showed incredible strength in the face of such injustice and adversity.

With the help of some important friends, he summoned a fierce level of resolve that was nothing short of remarkable for someone who was struggling to make it from the living room to the kitchen.

And what he did was so important. Like others, he exposed a flawed system for what it is - a cold, automated project that has no time for personal circumstances and prioritises efficiency light years ahead of empathy.

Of course the Department of Work and Pensions responded to the adverse publicity by paying Stephen back the more than £4,000 that he had been so wrongfully denied - but who can know the effects that battle will have had on his weak and vulnerable body?

 

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, peterms said:

The people who vote for these scum tend to gloss over posts like this and go quiet until Diane Abbott says something stupid. 

This isn't a one off. There are countless cases like this, the dwp is at war with those that most need the protection of the state. This is Conservative party policy. **** the poor, they don't vote tory anyway. There's blood on their hands and they should pay the price. 

Edited by Davkaus
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davkaus said:

dwp is at war with those that most need the protection of the state

dwp, nhs, dfe - thats the thing with acronyms though they're so interchangeable!

recent Labour govenments have been no different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sajid Javid urged to act in immigration scandal 'bigger than Windrush'

Quote

The home secretary, Sajid Javid, is under mounting pressure to head off an immigration scandal that MPs have warned could be “bigger than Windrush”.

About 34,000 foreign students have had their visas cancelled or curtailed and more than 1,000 people were forcibly removed from the UK as a result of the English language testing scandal, which involved the government accusing tens of thousands of students who sat a Home Office-approved test of cheating.

The Guardian understands that students who took the test of English for international communication (Toeic) five or more years ago are still being targeted by immigration enforcement officers and being taken to immigration detention centres ahead of enforced removal from the UK.

The drive to find and deport potential cheats began during Theresa May’s tenure as home secretary, when she promised to create a “hostile environment” for migrants deemed to be in the country illegally.

Thousands of students who have remained in the UK to fight to clear their reputations have spent the past five years attempting to prove that they are not guilty of cheating, but most have struggled because the Home Office has told them they have no right of appeal in the UK and must leave the country.

Amid criticism from MPs, Javid is expected to rule on the fate of thousands of the targeted students this week.

Undercover filming in a Panorama documentary broadcast in 2014 revealed clear evidence of fraud in at least two testing centres, as students took the test, which is required as part of the student visa-renewal process.

In one, the invigilator was seen reading out the answers to a multiple choice test, while in another, fake candidates arrived to take the test on behalf of those who were due to sit the exam, with the invigilators fully aware that the students were being assisted by paid proxies.

There is no doubt that there was a well-organised cheating system operating in those centres when filming took place; what is less clear is how many people were involved in the fraud.

The Panorama reporter showed the footage to May, then the home secretary, who commented: “What Panorama has uncovered is extremely important. It’s very shocking and I want to do something about it.”

The Home Office cancelled the visas of tens of thousands of students who had taken the Toeic test, large numbers of whom protest that they did not cheat. More than 4,000 have left the country without an opportunity to prove their innocence, having been told that they could be arrested if they did not leave. Immigration enforcement officers visited the homes of more than 3,600 students, as the Home Office attempted to round up all those accused of cheating.

Many of those who believe they have been wrongly targeted have asked for an opportunity to sit a new English test, pointing out that they had no need to cheat as they speak fluent English. Some were studying for degrees in English literature, others were PhD students, and some were nearing the end of accountancy and law degrees.

Those who remained in the UK have been prevented from continuing to study and are unable to work while they attempt to prove their innocence. They are also unable to open bank accounts or rent properties. Many have had to rely on their families, who helped pay fees for their unfinished courses in the UK and are now funding their attempts to have their visas reinstated so that they can continue with their studies.

The allegation of cheating in the UK makes applying to study elsewhere extremely difficult. Most chose to study in the UK because of Britain’s international reputation as a country with good universities and a reliable justice system. Because the Toeic issue has never become headline news, many say their families at home have begun to believe they must have cheated, convinced the UK government could not make such an error.

Campaigners representing students contesting the Home Office’s allegation of cheating say most of those affected have been made unwell by the prolonged strain of attempting to prove their innocence. Many have been pushed into destitution. The organisation Migrant Voice, which has worked with dozens of those affected, says many have contemplated or attempted suicide.

Mike Gapes, the MP for Ilford South, who has advised a number of affected people in his constituency, describes this as “a bigger scandal than Windrush in terms of the number of individuals removed from the country and whose livelihoods are being destroyed by anguish and despair”. The issue has its roots in the same period at the Home Office under May, when officials were developing the hostile environment, under pressure to reduce net migration to the tens of thousands and show voters that the government was taking firm steps to control illegal immigration.

The American company that administered the test, Educational Testing Service (ETS), told the Home Office that it had conducted a voice analysis of recordings of all 58,458 tests taken in 96 test centres in the UK between 2011 and 2014 and concluded that 33,725 people cheated, and a further 22,694 people had “questionable results”. Only about 2,000 were found not to have cheated.

Stephen Timms, the Labour MP for East Ham, is sceptical about these findings. “It think it’s nonsense. There is no way that 90% of those who sat the test were cheating. Do they really believe they were presiding over a system in which over 90% were cheating? It doesn’t make sense. It’s completely implausible.

“Panorama established that a few dozen people cheated, but the way the government has responded has blighted the lives of thousands and thousands who did not cheat. All the people I’ve met feel mortified that anyone would think they would cheat.

“A number of them haven’t dared to tell their family at home they have been accused of cheating because the shame is so great. They are all in the most terrible situation. A lot of the victims are living in the shadows and are ashamed to talk about it. It is surprising there hasn’t been more uproar.”

Hundreds of court hearings have subsequently questioned the reliability of the evidence provided by ETS and the Home Office. Some students have been accused of sitting a test in one centre but have clear proof that they sat it in another. At least one of those accused never sat the Toeic test but has nevertheless had his visa cancelled with no opportunity to appeal.

Timms has been told by Javid’s office that the home secretary is still waiting for some answers before deciding how to proceed. During a meeting at the end of last year, Javid told Timms and two other MPs: “I am sympathetic.”

An all-party parliamentary group has been set up to campaign on the issue and will have its first meeting in May; MPs will talk to students, lawyers and immigration judges, researching a new investigation.

Javid told Timms in the Commons on 1 April that he was taking “this issue very seriously. I have asked my officials to review it.” Campaigners are hopeful that the home secretary may finally be on the brink of taking steps to rectify the matter.

Nazek Ramadan, the director of Migrant Voice, said: “It’s an outrage that thousands of students are still suffering, five years after the first wrongful allegations. In this country, you’re supposed to be innocent until proven guilty – but for these students, that principle was thrown out of the window.

“We’ve heard from students, lawyers and judges that the Home Office has failed to present any evidence at all in most cases. In other cases, the evidence they’ve presented has been totally flawed. The only solution now is a political one. This was a Windrush-style textbook example of bad decision-making, but the home secretary has the power to put some of it right and give these students their futures back.”

A Home Office spokesperson said: “The 2014 investigation into the abuse of English language testing revealed systemic cheating which was indicative of significant organised fraud.

“The scale of this is shown by the fact that 25 people who facilitated this fraud have received criminal convictions, including four individuals convicted earlier this month of conspiracy to commit fraud.”

ETS was contacted for comment.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, bickster said:

He'll appeal without doubt as it delays the recall petition triggering

Even if he did, would it delay it that much?

He may just rely on Mrs J Hore leading a letter-writing campaign on his behalf. :)

Edited by snowychap
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, snowychap said:

Even if he did, would it delay it that much?

it delays the process until the appeal is exhausted. Fiona whatserface the Labour Perjury Idiot  only had her appeal exhausted at the start of March, she'd finished her sentence at this point, which is why the petition clock only started on March 19th(?) So the delay can be quite long

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, bickster said:

it delays the process until the appeal is exhausted. Fiona whatserface the Labour Perjury Idiot  only had her appeal exhausted at the start of March, she'd finished her sentence at this point, which is why the petition clock only started on March 19th(?) So the delay can be quite long

Perhaps. If he appealed, he'd be in danger of having his sentence increased, though, wouldn't he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, snowychap said:

Perhaps. If he appealed, he'd be in danger of having his sentence increased, though, wouldn't he?

True, would it be over a year in Prison though. Do they still get paid if they are in the clink?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bickster said:

True, would it be over a year in Prison though. Do they still get paid if they are in the clink?

I doubt it would be any prison time. Could bump up his 'unpaid work' hours, perhaps?

I think they get paid whatever their location - whether they're in prison, 'the jungle', hiding from TV cameras for charity on a gameshow or twatting around Italy. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, snowychap said:

I doubt it would be any prison time. Could bump up his 'unpaid work' hours, perhaps?

I think they get paid whatever their location - whether they're in prison, 'the jungle', hiding from TV cameras for charity on a gameshow or twatting around Italy. :)

So he gets to pick up more litter vs extending his pay packet. He'll appeal

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

 

Britain's top civil servant has demanded ministers co-operate with his inquiry into the leaking of discussions at the National Security Council.

Sir Mark Sedwill has written to ministers on the council and their special advisers after the Daily Telegraph reported details of a meeting about Chinese telecoms firm Huawei.

It comes amid mounting pressure for a more robust response to the leak.

Several cabinet ministers have denied they were involved.

Following Tuesday's meeting of the council, the Daily Telegraph reported that it had agreed to allow Huawei limited access to help build Britain's new 5G network, amid warnings about possible risks to national security.

The paper also reported that various ministers had raised concerns about the plan.

There has been a backlash against the leak, with Culture Secretary Jeremy Wright saying the government cannot rule out the possibility of a criminal investigation.

Cabinet Secretary Sir Mark, who is also the National Security Adviser, is leading the internal inquiry.

 

BBC

Chinese comms and nuclear power stations.

Why bother with an army, since they're running it into the ground anyway?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

Eton College enjoys an 80 per cent tax cut because it is a charity while state schools shoulder ‘the worst cuts in a generation.’

The prestigious all-boys school, which charges parents £40,000 a year, is expected to save £1.4 million over the next few years thanks to the perk.

Critics are calling for school ‘tax loopholes’ to be closed, at a time when skint state schools are asking parents to buy pens, pencils and toilet paper.

According to rates experts Altus Group, Eton College’s bill will be slashed from £831,600 to £166,320 this year and from £851,400 to £170,280 next year.

The saving of nearly £1.4m will add to the £1.8 million saved over the last three years.

The school and sixth form for boys aged 13 to 18 received £8.5 million in donations on top of £51 million in school fees, according to the Charity Commission.

It also has £437 million of ‘funds carried forward’ and raked in £12.3 million in investment income last year.

Altus says just over half of private schools have charitable status and will save £223 million over the next two years thanks to the tax break.

Unions have described state schools as being at ‘breaking point’, with the number of secondary schools running at a loss shooting from 8.1 per cent in 2014 to 30.3 per cent last year.

On average debt saddled by local authority run secondary schools is £483,569, according to the Education Policy Institute.

Academies, voluntary aided and foundation schools can also benefit from the 80 per cent relief and special schools are exempt from rates.

Robert Hayton, head of UK business rates at Altus called for a ‘level playing field’ for school rates.'

He added: ‘It cannot be right that council-run schools pay normal business rates, but both private schools and academies, using charitable status, receive an 80 per cent discount.’

 

Metro/Mirror

Falling over themselves to put public funds into the suit's pockets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard on the radio before that the US is saying they'll refuse to share intelligence with any country that uses Huawei to build ANY of its communication networks.

Good work, I look forward to our defensive alliance with Mozambique and Angola  It'll be the new Special Relationship

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/04/2019 at 22:38, bickster said:

I heard on the radio before that the US is saying they'll refuse to share intelligence with any country that uses Huawei to build ANY of its communication networks.

Good to see Apple getting their moneys worth - and they say the US political system doesn't work!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â