He is an idiot, and not for a second do I believe he had an infection in December.
But, that's not what the Aussie court was looking into, and the case must have been dismissed - anything else would also be a joke.
It a competition of who is more stupid, a tennis player who is obviously lying, or the Aussie government trying to make a point and falling on their own sword.
If the guy brought proof of previous infection, what else was the court supposed to do?