PieFacE

I've never really known what type of midfielder Delph is. He has many aspects of his games which he's okay at, but nothing he's brilliant. Though lately he's looking much better. I think he should watch videos of Ramires. I think that's the player I'd like Delph try to emulate. Sit deep and then break with pace on the counter. I think he's got the athleticism for it, he just needs to push forward a bit more. I'd like us to play ------------------------ Sylla ------------Westwood ---- Delph ----------- -Weimann ------------------------------Gabby -----------------------Benteke Have Sylla just holding as an Anchorman which will give the fullbacks a bit more license to go forward similar to Mikel for Chelsea, and Delph getting forward more.

The thing is apparently we offered Guzan a contract but he still chose to leave the club because of a lack of first team football (Think McLeish said that on Goals on Sunday). For Guzan to come back Lambert must have promised him game time. Which I find strange because i'm not sure how Lambert would have known what Guzan was capable of as he barely played?

Has anyone been to the Electric Cinema before? Just bought some tickets to go see The Place Beyond the Pines. Seems to be the only cinema showing it.

If this had have been introduced when football started in 1992 then yeah, I'm all for it. But it's gone way past the point that it needed to be introduced, it's just too late now.

I think a big reason for keeping Nzogbia could be to keep Benteke happy. Zog and Chris are good mates off the field apparently and they are both probably helping Sylla settle in. Lambert will want to keep the team spirit as high as possible. Maybe keeping Nzogbia can benefit AVFC in other ways than on the pitch. If holding onto Nzogbia means keeping Benteke happy then i'm all for it. Though most of this post is pure speculation other than Zog and Benteke being mates.

What an strange thing to say. I think we will sign a Steve this summer. No idea which one. Hope its a good one.

I disagree. I think there's more to be said and I think Torres is the main problem in that Chelsea team. He's a huge part of the reason why Chelsea are having such a terrible season. Torres scoring 20 goals does not paper over the cracks. If Falcao was in that team he'd probably have 50goals. I'd much rather play against Torres than Ba.

He's really not. He used to make a difference in the big games. I don't think he's scored over 10 Premier League goals. I don't think he has scored against a top 6 club yet this season. Most of his 20 have come from Europe and Cups. (all against much weaker opposition). And when you look at the creativity in Chelsea's midfield, he should be scoring left ring and center.

Why would you watch Sky on your Xbox if you've got a sky box? **** knows. Saves changing the channel? Have an "all in one" media center? Dunno really... some seem to think it would be a really good feature though. Think i'll just change the channel myself.

Does sound quite crazy

I like Albrighton. The lad just needs some belief and confidence. I've seen enough of him to know that he has a place here at Villa, as a squad player, similar to Bannan. You wont find many players better than Bannan and Albrighton for the wages they are on, should be kept in the squad... unless they want to move for first team football.

I think we need midfielders too. Delph, Bannan, Syllah are all okay, but not influential enough. None of them can really change a game. Westwood is okay and I have confidence he will kick on and step up a gear. Ireland to go as well please.

Sorry I should have been more specific, was posting in a rush Yeah there's a lot of speculation. I read another rumour that the new Xbox will have a HDMI pass-through connection to act as a PVR device. So I assume in the UK we could link our Sky box to it and watch Sky on the xbox without streaming maybe? Not sure.

Shall we discuss MON again?

**** bullshit. Getting so sick of this. It ruins my weekend when they keep moving games to Sunday and Monday.

Boring boring Barca! I cant help but want them to lose, they bore the life out of me.

:lol: We've really not missed him at all have we? It's amazing that we paid 18m for him. Though, I will admit at the time I thought it was a great signing. Shame all of our creative players wanted to leave straight after.

God the Villa section is becoming incredibly tedious on here lately.

There's something I quite like about Neville, his personality and influence more than his ability.... we could have really done with him and his experience this season to help the kids, particularly around Christmas. Though, I'm hoping we can find someone better in the summer.

Newcastle had a lot of chances against Fulham. We can definitely get goals against them... it's just a matter how how many they score against us.

To be honest, I just assumed it would be a given. I think Microsoft were able to charge for it initially because the service was considerably better than PSN. But we as customers now expect to access online features such as Lovefilm and Facebook for free from any device. (Obviously with Lovefilm you pay a fee to Lovefilm, but you shouldnt have to pay a fee to give you access to the service you've already bought.) If google started making you have to pay for a Gold Membership to access things like Skygo, Netflix and Lovefilm the world would go mad. Microsoft shouldn't be able to get away with it. I can understand them making consumers need a Gold Membership for gaming online, fair enough, but not third party apps which are free on PC. (Then again, online gaming is free on a PC too). Huh, please explaine this to me. To watch things such as Lovefilm and Netflix on your xbox you need to pay for a Gold Membership. So if Google charged you for a Gold Membership in Chrome for the browser to get access to such sites the world wouldn't be happy. Microsoft shouldn't charge you for using other companies services, is what i'm getting at.

To be honest, I just assumed it would be a given. I think Microsoft were able to charge for it initially because the service was considerably better than PSN. But we as customers now expect to access online features such as Lovefilm and Facebook for free from any device. (Obviously with Lovefilm you pay a fee to Lovefilm, but you shouldnt have to pay a fee to give you access to the service you've already bought.) If google started making you have to pay for a Gold Membership to access things like Skygo, Netflix and Lovefilm the world would go mad. Microsoft shouldn't be able to get away with it. I can understand them making consumers need a Gold Membership for gaming online, fair enough, but not third party apps which are free on PC. (Then again, online gaming is free on a PC too).

I just cannot use a PS2/3/4 controller. They hurt my hands. Think i'll still go Xbox - mostly because all my friends will too. M$ have to do something with XBLive to justify making customers spending money on it, or make it free like the PSNetwork.

I'd probably still buy it if it was £500. My phone works out about that every year too.

I've used Airsync for years, streaming music from phone to Xbox. Works very well. Never used it for video mind.