Jump to content

Paul Lambert


Pilchard

Recommended Posts

 

Why did u not sign a quality attacking midfielder?

£££££ limited.

 

 

Interesting to see his comments about lukaku and that he wanted to bring in both him and tekkers but couldn't afford to. So he has his eyes on the right kind of players it's just doing what he can with the mone lerner gives him. Hopefully next summer he will be given a nice wedge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did u not sign a quality attacking midfielder?

£££££ limited.

Interesting to see his comments about lukaku and that he wanted to bring in both him and tekkers but couldn't afford to. So he has his eyes on the right kind of players it's just doing what he can with the mone lerner gives him. Hopefully next summer he will be given a nice wedge.

What/where are the comments re Lukaku?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Why did u not sign a quality attacking midfielder?

£££££ limited.

Interesting to see his comments about lukaku and that he wanted to bring in both him and tekkers but couldn't afford to. So he has his eyes on the right kind of players it's just doing what he can with the mone lerner gives him. Hopefully next summer he will be given a nice wedge.

What/where are the comments re Lukaku?

 

 

 

 

 

Why did u not sign a quality attacking midfielder?

£££££ limited.

Interesting to see his comments about lukaku and that he wanted to bring in both him and tekkers but couldn't afford to. So he has his eyes on the right kind of players it's just doing what he can with the mone lerner gives him. Hopefully next summer he will be given a nice wedge.

What/where are the comments re Lukaku?

 

 

in yesterdays edition of the Birmingham mail...he was asked would you have wanted both Benteke and Rom and he said yes....both powerful lads with a great goalscoring rate, but different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Lambert gets decent backing, where he can bring in a few finished articles where we need them. Plus with Okore returning next year, we will win trophies. I think Lambert is THAT good. I just hope he gets backed before a more ambitious club comes in for him.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did u not sign a quality attacking midfielder?

£££££ limited.

Interesting to see his comments about lukaku and that he wanted to bring in both him and tekkers but couldn't afford to. So he has his eyes on the right kind of players it's just doing what he can with the mone lerner gives him. Hopefully next summer he will be given a nice wedge.

What/where are the comments re Lukaku?

That he spoke to Chelsea before he had looked at benteke to bring him in but couldn't afford to do it, was then asked if he could of afforded lukaku would it haven been him instead of benteke, he said no I would of had them both

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would that have fitted Lambert's system?

The system probably would have been different, or Lukaku would have been a wide forward.

As much as Benteke and Lukaku are big, strong players, they're actually very different in terms of natural playing style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would that have fitted Lambert's system?

You're right, it wouldn't. Bent is the answer.

He didn't say he was. It was a genuine question, a good question.

Where would Lukaku play? I'd agree with the outside forward role.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would that have fitted Lambert's system?

You're right, it wouldn't. Bent is the answer.

He didn't say he was. It was a genuine question, a good question.

Where would Lukaku play? I'd agree with the outside forward role.

Yeah course it was.

Slip lukaku in for either gabby or andi, or I'd imagine Lambert would play his 352, which I think would be his formation of choice had he been backed with money for his top targets, which IMO would have consisted of clyne, the lad from Ipswich, belhanda and now lukaku

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

How would that have fitted Lambert's system?

You're right, it wouldn't. Bent is the answer.

He didn't say he was. It was a genuine question, a good question.

Where would Lukaku play? I'd agree with the outside forward role.

Yeah course it was.

Slip lukaku in for either gabby or andi, or I'd imagine Lambert would play his 352, which I think would be his formation of choice had he been backed with money for his top targets, which IMO would have consisted of clyne, the lad from Ipswich, belhanda and now lukaku

 

 

It's a good question because we would rather have both up top, so the question is do we go 4-4-2 considering we are weak in midfield and have no decent wingers. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would that have fitted Lambert's system?

You're right, it wouldn't. Bent is the answer.
He didn't say he was. It was a genuine question, a good question.

Where would Lukaku play? I'd agree with the outside forward role.

Yeah course it was.

Slip lukaku in for either gabby or andi, or I'd imagine Lambert would play his 352, which I think would be his formation of choice had he been backed with money for his top targets, which IMO would have consisted of clyne, the lad from Ipswich, belhanda and now lukaku

It's a good question because we would rather have both up top, so the question is do we go 4-4-2 considering we are weak in midfield and have no decent wingers.

He probably would've played his narrow Norwich formation which always had 2 up top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â