CI Posted November 11, 2011 Author Share Posted November 11, 2011 Todays back page London Metro headline had Terry down as Capt ? And yes, he is guilty IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtsimonw Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 What do you mean 'IMO'? He's either been found guilty or he hasn't. There's no opinion about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
makouns_grin Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 Todays back page London Metro headline had Terry down as Capt ? And yes, he is guilty IMO Are you mental? Lampard is captain, no if no buts he IS captain. Why are you bothered about what an out of date paper is saying. Terry been found guilty as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 Now that poppygate is over is he back to being a word removed? He's admitted saying black word removed but he argues the video doesn't show the context, so yes he's guilty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CI Posted November 12, 2011 Author Share Posted November 12, 2011 What do you mean 'IMO'? He's either been found guilty or he hasn't. There's no opinion about it. This is a debating forum, and its all about opinions, you have yours, I'll have mine. Not a difficult concept really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudevillaisnice Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 He's admitted saying black word removed but he argues the video doesn't show the context, so yes he's guilty Where? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 I'll try and find it, the initial defence was that he'd said blind but treys statement said that the quality of the video and the head that goes across the screen takes away the context of what he said, the video they are investigating is from a different angle and they've only released stills of it like I said before poppygate and the prolongation of the investigation suggests to me they are going to throw the book at him but want these games out of the way first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtsimonw Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 What do you mean 'IMO'? He's either been found guilty or he hasn't. There's no opinion about it. This is a debating forum, and its all about opinions, you have yours, I'll have mine. Not a difficult concept really Eh? MG asked "Has he been found guilty?" that is a yes/no answer, there is no opinion about it. He never asked for your opinion, he asked for an answer based on a fact. It's really not that difficult to understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CI Posted November 12, 2011 Author Share Posted November 12, 2011 IMO he will be found guilty It really isn't that difficult to understand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtsimonw Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 Yes, we get what your opinion is. But that's not what he asked. Jesus Christ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CI Posted November 13, 2011 Author Share Posted November 13, 2011 We did just fine without the loser Can't see why we would ever give him another cap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
makouns_grin Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 WILL face criminal charges. Shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Terry will be charged with a racially aggravated public order offence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDrums Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 Glad this c@nt is getting his just deserts. Hateful cretin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 "The decision was taken in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors and after careful consideration of all the evidence I am satisfied there is sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction and it is in the public interest to prosecute this case. "Mr Terry will appear before West London magistrates' court on 1 February 2012. He is now summonsed with a criminal offence and has the right to a fair trial. It is extremely important that nothing should be reported which could prejudice his trial." The CPS also released the full text of the charge against Terry, which reads: "On 23rd October 2011 at Loftus Road Stadium, London W12 you used threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress which was racially aggravated in accordance with section 28 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Contrary to section 31 (1) © of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998." link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 He'll obviously have a very good lawyer, could he get off dispite the evidence? **cough** Gerrard **cough** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilS Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 He'll obviously have a very good lawyer, could he get off dispite the evidence? **cough** Gerrard **cough** Now come on. You know full well that Gerrard was minding his own business, having a few drinks and a dance in the pub/club with his mates, when that naughty man started attacking Steven Gerrard's hands with his face and body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowychap Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 He'll obviously have a very good lawyer, could he get off dispite the evidence? Does the evidence necessarily point to his guilt on the charge put forward, though? I could see a line of argument that concentrates on the public order aspect rather than what he specifically said or whether or not he is a racist cock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 John terrys lawyer is already preparing the misunderstanding statement as we speak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_c Posted December 21, 2011 Share Posted December 21, 2011 John terrys lawyer is already preparing the misunderstanding statement as we speak Mr Terry believed the phrase 'c#nt' to be a term of endearment. As people refer to him as one all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts