duke313 Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Not that I want the Everton goal ruled out, but what was the difference in that and the goal we had disallowed v Sheff Utd when Ramsey touched the keeper on the arm? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSvillain Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Anyone who is actually watching the game would have seen that Spurs have had very little control of this game since their goal (as is the case in most of their games), that Everton goal is no surprise. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke313 Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 1 minute ago, VillaChris said: Vicario ain't great when players crowd around him at corners. That's our formula for the Villa Park game at least. Still think Spurs will win this but that will put doubts in their mind that Everton can score from very little. VAR will rule ours out though, like Sheff Utd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillaChris Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Was a nonsense we lost that Sheffield goal due to Ramsey touching the keeper (and play then went on for nearly 10 seconds before we scored). Look at the goals given since. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSvillain Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Just now, duke313 said: Not that I want the Everton goal ruled out, but what was the difference in that and the goal we had disallowed v Sheff Utd when Ramsey touched the keeper on the arm? PGMOL would argue that Ramsey 'grabbed' Foderingham is my guess, not that I disagree with your underlying point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Just now, duke313 said: Not that I want the Everton goal ruled out, but what was the difference in that and the goal we had disallowed v Sheff Utd when Ramsey touched the keeper on the arm? Ramsey had hold of the goalkeepers arm and was actively pulling it. The Everton goal the player had no arms on the goalkeeper at all and was just backing into him. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PieFacE Posted February 3 VT Supporter Share Posted February 3 1 minute ago, duke313 said: Not that I want the Everton goal ruled out, but what was the difference in that and the goal we had disallowed v Sheff Utd when Ramsey touched the keeper on the arm? Ramsey held him to stop him from moving. Harrison just stood his ground. Had Harrison held Vicario it wouldn't have counted I suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OutByEaster? Posted February 3 Moderator Share Posted February 3 5 minutes ago, BleedClaretAndBlue said: Struck Gold with van de Ven They did - I mean, for fifty million euros, you do expect quality, but he certainly settled well before his injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke313 Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 1 minute ago, Genie said: Ramsey had hold of the goalkeepers arm and was actively pulling it. The Everton goal the player had no arms on the goalkeeper at all and was just backing into him. So basically, backing into player is fine, lightly touching the arm is not? We’d do well to remember this when Spurs come to town in few weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyM3000 Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 (edited) Personally think if you aren't going for the ball it should be a foul. Harrisons only aim is to back into the keeper and when you are jumping in the air a slight knock is going to impact you a lot, he might be weak but he's trying to get the ball and the other is not. Edited February 3 by AndyM3000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oishiiniku_uk Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Didn't Man City do the same thing against Vicario the other week? Not sure why Spurs don't put a blocker between the keeper and attacking players. Seems a pretty obvious tactic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 1 minute ago, duke313 said: So basically, backing into player is fine, lightly touching the arm is not? We’d do well to remember this when Spurs come to town in few weeks. If it was lightly touching the keeper it probably wouldn’t have been disallowed. He had hold of the keeper stopping him jump for the cross. Can’t believe people are still salty about it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke313 Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Just now, Genie said: If it was lightly touching the keeper it probably wouldn’t have been disallowed. He had hold of the keeper stopping him jump for the cross. Can’t believe people are still salty about it You sure about that? We had two stonewall penalties denied in the same match Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deeps Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Everton have been all of them as well. 4th is Spurs’s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PieFacE Posted February 3 VT Supporter Share Posted February 3 What a finish from Richarlison 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSvillain Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 1 minute ago, Genie said: If it was lightly touching the keeper it probably wouldn’t have been disallowed. He had hold of the keeper stopping him jump for the cross. Can’t believe people are still salty about it I think if there wasn't a backdrop of massive inconsistency with regards to decision making, people would be a lot more accepting of it tbf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 1 minute ago, duke313 said: You sure about that? We had two stonewall penalties denied in the same match I think your definition of “lightly touched” and “stonewall” need calibrating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Spurs have had 2 proper attacks and scored 2 goals. Frustrating. Everton have been the better side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedClaretAndBlue Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Chicken boy cookin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted February 3 Share Posted February 3 Jesus that was a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts