Jump to content

Messi vs Pele vs Maradona - Who's the GOAT?


messi11

Messi vs Pele vs Maradona - Who's the GOAT?  

71 members have voted

  1. 1. Who's The Greatest Footballer of All Time?



Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Stevo985 said:

He was already the greatest player of all time. The only thing people could hold over him (wrongly in my opinion) was that he hadn’t won and international trophy. Then when he did that the only thing people had on him was he’d never won a World Cup. 
 

Now he’s done that too. And he’s carried Argentina to both trophies. 
 

The argument against him being the greatest of all time is now non existent. 

No. Without the cup, Messi was not in the debate. Now, with the cup, Messi can enter the debate. Top two has become top three.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Messi vs Pele: 
Records: Arguable 
Accolades: Messi 
Individual honors: Messi
Dribbling: Messi
Passing: Messi
Heading: Pele
Finishing: Arguable
Long Range Shooting: Messi
Free Kicks: Messi

Final Score: Messi 6-1 Pele

Messi vs Maradona: 
Records: Messi 
Accolades: Messi 
Individual honors: Messi
Dribbling: Maradona
Passing: Messi
Heading: Arguable 
Finishing: Arguable 
Long Range Shooting: Messi
Free Kicks: Messi

Final Score: Messi 6-1 Maradona 

Edited by messi11
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PaulC said:

i dont think you can say that. They wouldnt have the same training facilities, they would get zero protection from refs, they wouldnt play on great pitches. Recovery methods different. They would be injured more and longevity wouldnt be there. Pele retired at 30. 

That’s why I said if you dropped them in now rather than if they grew up in that era

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AVTuco said:

No. Without the cup, Messi was not in the debate. Now, with the cup, Messi can enter the debate. Top two has become top three.

This argument was absolute nonsense before he won the World Cup and it’s still absolute nonsense now

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beastmix said:

Maradona, for me.

It's reasonable to say Maradona and Messi are directly comparible in ability, size, and style, so we could make a case to say, from a base-point, they're about as equal as it gets.

Then, take away all the advantages Messi has had: sport science, heavy data analysis, higher quality teammates (club/national), better pitches, and so on.

Take these things away and, suddenly, it should all become clearer.

Messi is still the 2nd best though... and I don't even like the man.

I agree, massive advantages for modern footballers in sports science, statistics, pitches, rules, fouling etc...

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Beastmix said:

 

Then, take away all the advantages Messi has had: sport science, heavy data analysis, higher quality teammates (club/national), better pitches, and so on.

Take these things away and, suddenly, it should all become clearer.

But everyone else in this era has those advantages too. So the opponents are better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 hours ago, Beastmix said:

 

It's reasonable to say Maradona and Messi are directly comparible in ability, size, and style, so we could make a case to say, from a base-point, they're about as equal as it gets.

Then, take away all the advantages Messi has had: sport science, heavy data analysis, higher quality teammates (club/national), better pitches, and so on.

These so called advantages you talk about. Defenders have these advantages also which levels it out!  So defenders would be better than in the olden days.

@Zhan_Zhuang@Beastmix Maradona also had the advantage of no var and dodgy refs, his two goals in his greatest performance of all time against England in the 1986 World Cup wouldn't of stood in todays game. Also Maradona era there was no drugs testing. Like the WWE/Wresting and most sports in the 80's/90's most of these Footballers would of been doping and most likely to cheat. 
 

Edited by Lupinthe5th
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Stevo985 said:

But everyone else in this era has those advantages too. So the opponents are better

No, but I'm pitting the two individuals against each other. Side by side.

They're effectively the same player, but one had far more advantages than the other, meaning the one who didn't, by definition, is the better player. Maradona, with all the advantages Messi has had, would have been horrifyingly good.

 

I mean, nobody can say, definitively, who the best is anyway. It's a boring debate, much like the greatest boxer is. There are too many variables to consider, so I'm simply throwing my argument into the ocean of arguments. The most alarming thing is Argentina have produced the two best players who ever played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lupinthe5th said:

 

These so called advantages you talk about. Defenders have these advantages also which levels it out!  So defenders would be better than in the olden days.

@Zhan_Zhuang@Beastmix Maradona also had the advantage of no var and dodgy refs, his two goals in his greatest performance of all time against England in the 1986 World Cup wouldn't of stood in todays game. Also Maradona era there was no drugs testing. Like the WWE/Wresting and most sports in the 80's/90's most of these Footballers would of been doping and most likely to cheat. 
 

...not sure this argument stands when we're literally talking about a footballer who's been on growth hormone drugs for the majority of his life. Medical purposes or not, it's a leg up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Beastmix said:

No, but I'm pitting the two individuals against each other. Side by side.

They're effectively the same player, but one had far more advantages than the other, meaning the one who didn't, by definition, is the better player. Maradona, with all the advantages Messi has had, would have been horrifyingly good.

 

I mean, nobody can say, definitively, who the best is anyway. It's a boring debate, much like the greatest boxer is. There are too many variables to consider, so I'm simply throwing my argument into the ocean of arguments. The most alarming thing is Argentina have produced the two best players who ever played.

But Maradona was playing against far inferior teams and players. Because nobody else had the advantages that Messi had either. 
 

You can’t take all the positives from playing in the modern era and ignore the negatives. 
 

The game hadn’t got easier. In fact it’s got far far harder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Lupinthe5th said:

 

These so called advantages you talk about. Defenders have these advantages also which levels it out!  So defenders would be better than in the olden days.

@Zhan_Zhuang@Beastmix Maradona also had the advantage of no var and dodgy refs, his two goals in his greatest performance of all time against England in the 1986 World Cup wouldn't of stood in todays game. Also Maradona era there was no drugs testing. Like the WWE/Wresting and most sports in the 80's/90's most of these Footballers would of been doping and most likely to cheat. 
 

Maradona didn't just play well in one game against England...he was unplayable against a very good Belgium team in the Semi-final and also scored two.

As I said before he single-handedly dragged an unfavoured Napoli team to greatness when they were often underdogs and the whole of Italy was against them. 

Well before that he was exceptional for Argentinos Juniors and Boca.

Serie A matches were known for being very tight games with few goals, Maradona changed that.

31 minutes ago, Beastmix said:

...not sure this argument stands when we're literally talking about a footballer who's been on growth hormone drugs for the majority of his life. Medical purposes or not, it's a leg up.

Never thought of that, help from the very latest in science and technology. Something former players did not benefit from...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Zhan_Zhuang said:

Maradona didn't just play well in one game against England...he was unplayable against a very good Belgium team in the Semi-final and also scored two.

As I said before he single-handedly dragged an unfavoured Napoli team to greatness when they were often underdogs and the whole of Italy was against them. 

Well before that he was exceptional for Argentinos Juniors and Boca.

Serie A matches were known for being very tight games with few goals, Maradona changed that.

Never thought of that, help from the very latest in science and technology. Something former players did not benefit from...

How did Maradona do at Barcelona compared to Messi?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, messi11 said:

Messi vs Pele: 
Records: Arguable 
Accolades: Messi 
Individual honors: Messi
Dribbling: Messi
Passing: Messi
Heading: Pele
Finishing: Arguable
Long Range Shooting: Messi
Free Kicks: Messi

Final Score: Messi 6-1 Pele

Messi vs Maradona: 
Records: Messi 
Accolades: Messi 
Individual honors: Messi
Dribbling: Maradona
Passing: Messi
Heading: Arguable 
Finishing: Arguable 
Long Range Shooting: Messi
Free Kicks: Messi

Final Score: Messi 6-1 Maradona 

Pretty much agree with this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zhan_Zhuang said:

22 goals in 36 games!

How would Messi do playing in Serie A with a midtable team?

At his peak I don’t see any reason why Messi wouldn’t have bettered that tally

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â