Jump to content

Next Villa Manager


Richard

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Richard said:

Well I hope you're good Mr Wagner,  to be honest in terms of comparisons you haven't got much in our recent history to be troubled about. I had hoped for Rowett but the best of luck to you.  There were worse choices.  You represent a gamble I hope to **** it pays off

Is this done or something?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Richard said:

Well I hope you're good Mr Wagner,  to be honest in terms of comparisons you haven't got much in our recent history to be troubled about. I had hoped for Rowett but the best of luck to you.  There were worse choices.  You represent a gamble I hope to **** it pays off

Huh?  What did I miss?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BOF said:

What's this about required win rates for the new manager?  Let's take a looksee.

Points required to get into playoffs in past 7 seasons
15/16 - 74pts
14/15 - 78
13/14 - 72
12/13 - 68
11/12 - 75
10/11 - 75
09/10 - 70

1. Maximum - 78pts
2. Average - 73
3. Minimum - 68

Games left - 35
Points so far - 10

To at least reach the points required in the above scenarios
1. 68pts required (17 wins = 51pts + 17) = 48.6% win rate
2. 63pts (14 wins = 42pts + 21) = 40.0%
3. 58pts (12 wins = 36pts + 22) = 34.3%

So even in the most difficult year to reach the playoffs, 14/15, at this point in the season we would not have needed a 50% win rate.  That's not to say it will be remotely easy to do.  Just that it's not quite as insurmountable as is being made out.  Plus I still probably foolishly think this squad once it is used right will steamroll sides too. 

Sorry, what are the plus numbers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BOF said:

What's this about required win rates for the new manager?  Let's take a looksee.

Points required to get into playoffs in past 7 seasons
15/16 - 74pts
14/15 - 78
13/14 - 72
12/13 - 68
11/12 - 75
10/11 - 75
09/10 - 70

1. Maximum - 78pts
2. Average - 73
3. Minimum - 68

Games left - 35
Points so far - 10

To at least reach the points required in the above scenarios
1. 68pts required (17 wins = 51pts + 17) = 48.6% win rate
2. 63pts (14 wins = 42pts + 21) = 40.0%
3. 58pts (12 wins = 36pts + 22) = 34.3%

So even in the most difficult year to reach the playoffs, 14/15, at this point in the season we would not have needed a 50% win rate.  That's not to say it will be remotely easy to do.  Just that it's not quite as insurmountable as is being made out.  Plus I still probably foolishly think this squad once it is used right will steamroll sides too. 

Isn't that not losing a game though? Or have I misread....Surely most teams will end up with at least 7/8 defeats. 

Edited by Mammoth10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Woodytom said:

Sorry, what are the plus numbers?

Getting draws with the remaining games.  It's all based around the minimum win percentage based on the games remaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, dont_do_it_doug. said:

Wagner would have to be absolutely mental to rule himself out. It doesn't mean we are interested. 

Not really we are in such a bigger mess. He could ruin his career like the last four managers! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, dont_do_it_doug. said:

Wagner would have to be absolutely mental to rule himself out. It doesn't mean we are interested. 

Not really we are in such a bigger mess. He could ruin his career like the last four managers! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mammoth10 said:

Isn't that not losing a game though? Or have I misread....

That's true, but it's also drawing a hell of a lot.  I'd gladly swap out a few draws for losses if I was also swapping out a few draws for wins.  In that sense you'd be increasing the win percentage.  I was trying to demonstrate the minimum win percentage.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Woodytom said:

Right I get it. Your stats are a bit flawed then as we're not going 35 games unbeaten are we?

That's not what I'm trying to demonstrate.  See post above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BOF said:

That's not what I'm trying to demonstrate.  See post above.

Ok, first of all I appreciate the effort. I tried to work it out myself but I couldn't be arsed.

However, they're completely unrealistic.

For instance, I think it's more feasible for us to gain a 60% win ratio than us to gain a 40% ratio but remain unbeaten. I get what your saying in that 'it's possible', but in terms of likelihood, the chances are very very slim indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â