Jump to content

The Chairman Mao resembling, Monarchy hating, threat to Britain, Labour Party thread


Demitri_C

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, villa4europe said:

jezza has tweeted about bury saying that under a labour government fans would get a say in the running of the club

what an absolute lie that is

Why do you think that?  It's an existing LP policy, and what is proposed is entirely achievable.  My criticism would be that the proposal is too modest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, peterms said:

Why do you think that?  It's an existing LP policy, and what is proposed is entirely achievable.  My criticism would be that the proposal is too modest.

the owners of an existing company have to accept a fan or the fans representative in some sort of meaningful capacity because Labour says so? yeah that's not going to happen

then you throw it out in to the context of the real world away from football, how are people who represent people other than the owners interests ie unions, doing in the failing automotive industry?

a fan sat on Bolton's board would change just about **** all 

its an empty promise to grab some votes, jezza man of the people saving football, boris the toff is probably a polo man so doesn't get it, what a load of bollocks

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, villa4europe said:

the owners of an existing company have to accept a fan or the fans representative in some sort of meaningful capacity because Labour says so? yeah that's not going to happen

The proposal is obviously to legislate to make it a requirement, not to expect companies to do it because they are requested to.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, bickster said:

He can't help himself, he invents policy on the spot without any real thought, it's just populist bollocks like his Ashes congratulatory tweet

He wants to nationalise almost everything and when he's not doing that he will intervene in as many things as possible, it'd be a truly tyrannical government.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, peterms said:

The proposal is obviously to legislate to make it a requirement, not to expect companies to do it because they are requested to.

again, meaningful capacity, what are would you expect them to do?

Bolton are going under because their owner pays himself too much, you expect 2 fan appointed board members to change that?

do these 2 board members get paid? how when the clubs have no money?

man utd have 11 board members, 4 of them glazers, you think 2 yellow and green scarf wearing board members will save them from their "bad" ownership?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, villa4europe said:

again, meaningful capacity, what are would you expect them to do?

Bolton are going under because their owner pays himself too much, you expect 2 fan appointed board members to change that?

do these 2 board members get paid? how when the clubs have no money?

man utd have 11 board members, 4 of them glazers, you think 2 yellow and green scarf wearing board members will save them from their "bad" ownership?

I suppose they would be paid the same as other directors, whether that is nothing, a little, or a lot, but that's not the point. 

Supporters on the board is something that supporters groups have asked for.  It's a step in the right direction, but as I said, the proposal is too modest.  We need something more far-reaching in terms of governance and control, liability, ability to load debt onto clubs and so on.  Perhaps the current situation will make more people agree with that line of thought.

But my question was why you think mentioning this modest existing policy is a lie.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, bickster said:

Wow, it is actually policy for once. Wouldn't have saved Bury FC one bit though which was the association he was trying to make

I don't think he claimed that, or implied it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr_Pangloss said:

He wants to nationalise almost everything and when he's not doing that he will intervene in as many things as possible, it'd be a truly tyrannical government.

2 fan representatives on the boards of football clubs is your definition of tyranny? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Labour's support among UK students nearly halves in 18 months amid Brexit frustration, survey suggests


Jeremy Corbyn's policy over EU makes young people change sides to pro-Remain parties

Labour's support among UK students has nearly halved in 18 months amid frustration at the party's position on Brexit, survey suggests.

The backing for Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party among young supporters has fallen by 32 percentage points since February 2018, according to the findings from Times Higher Education.

And the Labour party’s Brexit policy could be causing student voters to turn towards pro-Remain parties like the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party, the survey suggests.

The YouthSight survey, of nearly 1,000 students, reveals that support for Labour has plummeted from 70 per cent, of those who said that they were likely to vote, in February 2018 to 38 per cent.

Meanwhile, student backing for the pro-EU Liberal Democrats and Green Party has grown - with these parties now representing 19 per cent and 18 per cent of the student vote, the survey shows.

Indie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bickster said:

Labour's support among UK students nearly halves in 18 months amid Brexit frustration, survey suggests

Nothing that an aspiration to sort student debt once and for all can't fix

But, maybe this is also part of what team Boris are banking on in the event we head to a GE   ... They can pretty much hoover up the leave vote , the remain vote risks still being split with labour voters moving to a more remain liberal party ?  ... of course political non-aggression pacts by remain parties might supper those plans

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â