Jump to content

MaVilla

Established Member
  • Posts

    16,568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by MaVilla

  1. i would guess McGinn would be pure profit in terms of income, as the only cost he is to us currently is his wages etc, as you say, his tiny fee has almost certainly gone off the books now, especially as he has signed at least one new contract since he joined? i would guess Konsa, Mings, Hause & Luiz would also be pure profit, or very close to it, as they have been here close to 5 years, i would assume their amortization is in its final year (or already complete), and from the summer they will effectively class as pure profit for any fees we could receive for any of them?
  2. will be like any other player, becuase we paid a fee for him, so any future sale wont be pure FFP profit, like a developed youth player.
  3. tbf he was nursing an injury, which is why he didnt start.
  4. thats a good point re not set in stone, that would cause issues i guess, i would say its "possible", but as you imply, "possible" isnt the same as "practical", or even "viable". i guess the only way to know would be for someone to liaise with the train company and see what they got back. i dont know the train/carriage lengths, or the platform length, so i couldnt say, but they would know if it fit, or what would fit as it would all have been assessed historically.
  5. the carriages would be a regional or national stock, attributed to the sets nationally or regionally, in theory, if the had agreement to increase carriages, they would have to source them from the regional/national carriage stock, so it depends if they run with spare capacity, or would need to reduce in one place, to increase in others, depends on how they work. The train and the carriages are the train company, so they would know if they could do it or not, or with lead time, they might be able to plan for it in X months. timetables and plans are generally planned a year or so out, so it might take some lead time to agree it, but in theory, its feasible if agreed by all parties, as long as all the safety/performance validation is done, and it passes it all etc.
  6. you would need to get the train company and Network Rail to agree to additional carriages. If additional carriages were done before its prob easier overall, but if not it would need assessing, platform length checks, capacity checks, timetable changes maybe (at least short notice), as well as sourcing the extra carriages as stock is ofc limited. there are prob other things also tbh.
  7. any reason he isnt in their squad tonight?
  8. ye he does, same when he first started coming in to the team after he joined, then again after his injury, seems he does need some game time to get up to speed/fitness.
  9. didnt see you say that before. I had read that he dumped his wife for Halliwell, didnt realise his wife at the time was pregnant!? my lord.
  10. please be true. doubt it will be tho.
  11. Mr Horner allegedly living up to his name. oops. (obviously, denied by Mr Horner). edit: the Mail says alleged "incredibly controlling behaviour" and "inappropriate behaviour", so doenst actually seem that its sexual (maybe), seems it something else.
  12. Carlos was because i thought getting 100k p/w off our books for a backup CB, might be a good plan with the further reducing salary limits next year. opinions, i guess.
  13. im not insistent, its just that of all names mentioned in reports, its always Luiz's name mentioned, so it seemed logical to use his name until it proves not to be the case.
  14. i would also be gutted, but for the first time in a long time, i would trust our manager to spend any money we did get well, and buy a top class midfielder to replace him.
  15. For reference, the next game week (GW 24), is the game week last season where we went on a run of 8 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses (26/30 points available). also for reference, we are currently 18 points ahead of where we were last season (46 v 28), for the exact same game week.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â