Talking about the wolves non penalty
What did the officials say?
Referee Hooper: "No way, that's a collision, we don't give those."
VAR Salisbury: "So Onana goes to challenge the ball..."
Referee Hooper: "Goal-kick."
VAR Salisbury: "Just delay. Delay, delay, checking possible penalty.
Referee Hooper: "No worries mate."
VAR Salisbury: "You'll want to view this because I think Onana collides into it. He tries to go to the ball and he makes aerial contact with the Wolves player. It's late and it's clumsy in my opinion. Dawson wins the header, but it's late, very late in the aerial challenge.
"I think because the Wolves player doesn't head the ball, yeah because Dawson heads it, therefore it's a normal collision as they've both challenged the ball. Check complete.
Referee Hooper: "Check complete."
Since when has taking out a random player been acceptable? He states it's late and clumsy. It's like listening to two plastic manure fans justifying a blatant foul. I can never work out whether it is incompetence or corruption. Either way it's killing top flight football.