Jump to content

luckyeddie

Established Member
  • Posts

    628
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by luckyeddie

  1. Try this https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/66724505
  2. Yes the guy on VAR, realised halfway through manure had a new keeper
  3. I see read Aston Villa, but see dogheads. It's so wrong
  4. Yeah, that's copy and pasted off the BBC. But the conversation would have been completely different I'd Sa had taken out Fernandez in the same manner. That inconsistency is so obvious, but they act and talk as if it's not there.
  5. One Christmas, my mother once bought me a tub of seconds roses chocolates from the factory shop, but took out all her favourite ones, so it was two thirds full. It's the thought that counts, and the thought was shit. I'd have rather received nothing.
  6. A bloke in demon shorts and an open shirt leading kids to an isolated spot Creepy b*stard
  7. Gender is fluid (as in a man made concept) so revealing that is temporary. The sex of the child is (almost) conclusive so surely it should be a sex reveal party, but I guess that just sounds like a paedo party. I never understood the wish for a boy or girl, I would just pray they were healthy.
  8. Just started to play backgammon.
  9. Talking about the wolves non penalty What did the officials say? Referee Hooper: "No way, that's a collision, we don't give those." VAR Salisbury: "So Onana goes to challenge the ball..." Referee Hooper: "Goal-kick." VAR Salisbury: "Just delay. Delay, delay, checking possible penalty. Referee Hooper: "No worries mate." VAR Salisbury: "You'll want to view this because I think Onana collides into it. He tries to go to the ball and he makes aerial contact with the Wolves player. It's late and it's clumsy in my opinion. Dawson wins the header, but it's late, very late in the aerial challenge. "I think because the Wolves player doesn't head the ball, yeah because Dawson heads it, therefore it's a normal collision as they've both challenged the ball. Check complete. Referee Hooper: "Check complete." Since when has taking out a random player been acceptable? He states it's late and clumsy. It's like listening to two plastic manure fans justifying a blatant foul. I can never work out whether it is incompetence or corruption. Either way it's killing top flight football.
  10. Wouldn't Carlos's wages be covered by insurance, as suggested with Mings?
  11. Give it a couple of years and it will be DIY
  12. A chuck, adapt from normal to SDS bits
  13. Yeah, sorry Dem, you do get a lot of grief
  14. Isn't the Sabbath the only day you can't do it?
  15. Yeah, I tried it out. It's can be feral . Off topic seems more civilized.
  16. Pickford Again McBurnie because if CA was up on his own he wouldn't have dropped so deep to collect it, but busy occupying the three defenders.
  17. It's not just size and strength, but also durability. Watkins is a thoroughbred athlete which sets him apart. His goal yesterday, he got the opportunity because McBurnie gave it to him, if he was the lone striker he does not have that chance. He is made for the second striker role, not the lone striker.
  18. Yeah, I've seen him play. But he wasn't the single CF at Boro. Premier League defenders will bully him on his own. Ollie and Duran are units and have the physical attributes, I just don't see archer in that mould.
  19. Asking someone to honour their contract and holding someone hostage are not the same thing.
  20. I think we're saying the same thing. I think he's a good enough footballer, but I don't think he has or ever will have the physical strength to play 50 games a season as the single striker, not many players do but Ollie is a freak of an athlete. I get the impression he wants to play regular football, and couldn't here. Also probably got a pay rise.
  21. The VAR calls are so random and shit, they are probably linked to a betting syndicate...I love a good conspiracy theory.
  22. Cameron does not fit our system. He needs a striking partner, like McBurnie to do the donkey work. He may well be successful at other clubs, but I cannot ever see him make it here with Unai in charge. We cannot revolve our system around a player who isn't physical enough to play 95% of our games. I think it is just that he is a good CF, but not for us.
  23. I wonder if he will revert to one keeper on the bench when we are able to put out a bench full of quality internationals. I think he prefers an extra keeper to a youth player, but maybe not a top quality alternative.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â