For me I hope he goes for 35m+
and we invest most of that on another striker, an Attacking midfielder and a defensive midfielder. Just under 10m on each (fat chance)
Is this judgement based on being at the match or just seeing the highlights? I think it's a bit rash to judge a players' performance just on highlights. Also it would be interesting to know which aspects of his play proved him to be "very poor". It would be quite an achievement for any Fulham player to have registered as playing poorly against the shambles that was Palace. Was the vicious shot that Speroni just about managed to tip around the post an example of his very poor play?
I watched the match from minute 1 till the end. He was poor and was rightfully substituted. I'm not dissing Darren or hating on him. I am just stating the facts. He was silent in a game that he should not have been silent in. Even the commentators were saying how little he had touched the ball in the first 40 minutes. It was like Fulham were playing with 10 men. His "very poor play" as i mentioned was his inability to have any influence on the game, despite Fulham trouncing the opponents.
Watching his Shoot Q&A on AVTV - his english has dramatically improved. I do like him a lot, he seems like a nice chap. I won't be mad at him when he leaves.
Completely denies ever being on twitter, and says he has now plans to join it.
However, he also says he doesn't want to go on it because he prefers a private life, which unfortunately contradicts the Keek account he has.