Only one of us can be right? Either he is "awful" or he's as good as I've said.
It's your opinion that my observations based on last season's statistics are nonsense.
Fact is, compared to the rest of the squad, he did have a good season, because when he played generally the team did well. Don't sound surprised all over again as I've posted the stats again and again.
He was also noted in media for his astonishing crossing accuracy.
These are the stats that showed we should have kept him.
What happened was, Lambert bought in Westwood over the previous summer and decided to stick with where he spent his money and sell Bannan.
The best thing we can hope for if Bannan does a Ramsey on the back of much higher confidence levels is Palace get relegated we offer to buy him back, and Bannan still would like to come back.
At first, I just thought Con was just stubborn and didn't want to go back on what he had said about Bannan. Statements like this ^ however, make it clear that Con is just spouting nonsense in the hope someone will try to disagree with him and he will presumably get some sort of small kick out of it.