Totally, Sylla was actually tidy with the ball even though he didn't offer anything going forward, and he got himself about a bit. The difference though for me is that KEA is pro-active and Sylla is re-active, KEA gets further up the pitch to press and breaks things up before they start. Sylla is reacting much closer to the defence to situation that's already getting dangerous.
Once KEA went off we weren't pressing as high up the pitch anymore, so we were winning it back deeper and in areas it was harder to launch a quick counter from. Sylla was tidy?....... Ok then