Jump to content

romavillan

VT Supporter
  • Posts

    10,651
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by romavillan

  1. And 4-2-3-1? Would be ballsy but we could do with 3 points!
  2. Is it? 4-3-3 for me, if 4-4-2 its a diamond. I reckon 4-3-3 though, narrow 3 in midfield.
  3. Totally if he plays up front it should be in a big man, little man, front two.
  4. In theory I'm sort of with you but name one song by a brummie band that 5000 plus people would know all the words to? I'd love us to all sing the chorus to 'Come on lets go' by Birmingham's best modern band, broadcast. However I doubt more than one of them 5k travelling fans have ever heard it!
  5. Wasnt the last time we won two in a row back when Thatcher invented Hitler?
  6. A Gardner playing ti his potential would be a massive boost too
  7. You've not seen serie a for a long time.
  8. Cant believe hes dismissed as shit, as others have stated I think it was more to do with the team be was playing in. He looks very tidy with fiorentina because they are set up to play actual football, where players wearing the same shirt as you MOVE into space to give you different passing options to keep the ball. Something we have struggled with for years. Could do with him now as are far too light on numbers in the middle, if tish and Westwood get injured, we have to play only 2 in the middle...
  9. So poor second half, just a bunch of strangers. Way too many stupid mistakes, not sure we can stick with 4-4-2. Need a miracle to stay in touch in Jan and then invest.
  10. Can we just give up? Like just pack it in and go home? Start again in non league?
  11. They should be out of sight by now. We need to just keep the ball for 5 mins but it doesn't look like we can.
  12. Error strewn game, one every 30 secs from either team
  13. McCormick covering loads of ground when we don't have the ball
  14. @KHV zenga likes to play compact and through the middle if he has the players, not sure he does at wolves
  15. Richards as a right back at this level should be fine. 4-4-1-1 I think.
  16. If the choice is really down to Bruce or Clarke, maybe we can wait a couple of games to see if Clarke can have an immediate effect on the tactics/squad. If he manages to put a balanced team out that wins a couple on the bounce I'm not sure how much I'd want Bruce. On the other hand spudhead has been around a bit at this level and been successful. I would have liked for us to have had a punt on someone younger than either of them myself but right now we really can't be too picky or we could be talking about getting out of League One.
  17. Felt the odds on him were really short from the get go but there's nothign to rule him out yet so still not free money...
  18. Really? Don't you think he's just saying they aren't being impatient about making an appointment?
  19. Hmmm, no chance for Smith? Value in laying Bruce at evens? Will it not be him? Nowhere near as easy to bet on as last time after the wyness appointment! That was free money...
×
×
  • Create New...
Â