Demitri_C Posted March 12, 2011 Share Posted March 12, 2011 this thread has been Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 This is unfair for me. My husband is 4000 miles away. So the answer is never. But if I answer off of how it is as a couple when we are together it quite different....obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarethRDR Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 This is unfair for me. My husband is 4000 miles away. So the answer is never. But if I answer off of how it is as a couple when we are together it quite different....obviously. There is an equation you could do to work out a rough figure: Distance / regularity of visits² * nookie sessions (- length of nookie sessions) = self-abuse ratio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 Ha. I'll just say that when together it's everyday or 1-5 a week. Closer to the 5. In fact, 1-5 a week seems like they should be seperate categories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJA1703 Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 I live in the UK, and my girlfriend is in the US. If there was a box for, 2 months off, 2 weeks on, then that would be for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glarmorgan Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 There should be more filters there: 1. With/Without kids 2. During 3rd to 6th month of pregnancy (give or take). 3. Gay? Lesbo? Animal lover? 4. Number of wives (applies to Muslims, mainly ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarethRDR Posted March 13, 2011 Share Posted March 13, 2011 If there was a box for, 2 months off... then that would be for me. I can't do you a box, but I can do you an Underworld track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theunderstudy Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 Underworld.... Why does that ring a bell? Should it ring a bell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw63 Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 Yes, they're shit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan. Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 One hit wonders, like alot of VTers by the looks of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidlewis Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 they were better when they were Freur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarethRDR Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 Underworld.... Why does that ring a bell? Should it ring a bell? Born Slippy. Yes, they're shit But they wrote the above song with you in mind; "Shoutin' Lager Lager Lager". Ah wait, I get it now. Should've been "Shoutin' Scrumpy Scrumpy Scrumpy". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw63 Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 Underworld.... Why does that ring a bell? Should it ring a bell? Born Slippy. Yes, they're shit But they wrote the above song with you in mind; "Shoutin' Lager Lager Lager". Ah wait, I get it now. Should've been "Shoutin' Scrumpy Scrumpy Scrumpy". Its probably the worst, most annoying, most shit non-rap/hiphop "tune" in musical history Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingerlad Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 Underworld.... Why does that ring a bell? Should it ring a bell? Born Slippy. Yes, they're shit But they wrote the above song with you in mind; "Shoutin' Lager Lager Lager". Ah wait, I get it now. Should've been "Shoutin' Scrumpy Scrumpy Scrumpy". Its probably the worst, most annoying, most shit non-Beach Boys "tune" in musical history Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw63 Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 That's not amusing at all, rustycock :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 That's not amusing at all, rustycock :-( It was a little amusing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choffer Posted March 14, 2011 VT Supporter Share Posted March 14, 2011 There should be more filters there: 1. With/Without kids :shock: :shock: :shock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparey16 Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 quite alot during the days wednesday-saturday, definity 1-5 a week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw63 Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 quite alot during the days wednesday-saturday, definity 1-5 a week How very un-christian... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparey16 Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 over the legal age, nothing wrong about it (apart from the whole no sex before marriage idea, however my response is back in the days of the bible, by my age, i would of been married) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts