Jump to content

Czarnikjak

Established Member
  • Posts

    664
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Czarnikjak

  1. Last time we tried to calculate our ratio here it was around 80-90%, but this is with high degree of uncertainty. Yes, player sale profits also count, last 3 year average of your player sales goes towards the cap calculation. Grealish sale just dropping off that calculation was probably the main reason for selling Archer and Ramsey. Swiss Ramble is an authoritive source for me, you can take anything he writes is factually correct.
  2. We are not constrained by Premier League P&S that much. Bigger problem is UEFA salary cap, we are constrained by that now as we play in Europe. Having said that, I would expect focus in January to be selling people like Chambers and Traore (if possible at all), and reassessing in the summer when we know which competition we will be playing next season.
  3. Last released figures were £178m. Around March figures for last season will be released. Will struggle to hit £200m for that period (obv I'm not counting player sales). We gonna get around £14m boost for higher league placement, few extra bob for higher ticket prices, there was no major new commercial deals last season...all in all, maybe we will scrape £200m but i doubt it.
  4. Essentially yes (although I'm pretty sure once the actual work gets the green light and goes ahead you can recapitalise previous expenses and essentially "claim it back" from profit and loss perspective). In Everton case costs prior to June 2021 were expensed on the profit&loss account, I think that was the time when they were given the green light to go ahead with the build. If you're interested in Everton finances this Blog has you covered https://theesk.org/2022/05/30/evertons-financial-position-entering-the-summer/
  5. They could, but only after they received build permit you can start capitalising these costs. Any preliminary work before you get the the neccasary permits was counted towards ffp.
  6. Maybe they are low because they DO press high, not giving opposition even the chance to get caught offside. We don't press high and thus encourage long balls over compressed middle of the pitch. Risky strategy playing high line without press.
  7. Gerrard had no clue what he was doing and Purslow had massive ego. Both paid the price for their poor judgement, unfortunately it did cost us a lot of dough.
  8. Yup, even if it's just the salary off our books it's still worth it, as it looks like that was the best offer we got for him. Still better than paying him £135k every week.
  9. He could be a good company to other injured players in the treatment room.
  10. Lol, you would rather keep him so he can spend another year on the treatment table while we pay £7m for this privilege?
  11. Saudis or Qatari would buy anyone with only a passing resemblance to a footbal player...not sure Monchi deserves much credit for this one.
  12. Barcelona signed Coutinho for a reason too. I don't think the fact that Barcelona signed someone 5 years ago has any relevance to their current usefulness for Villa.
  13. So far the only idea Chris Heck shown is to flog fans via Terrace View...lets judge him by his actions not reputation from previous clubs.
  14. We don't need replacement for the treatment table place, and if you talking about pitch he never is never fit Anyway
  15. He is never available to play anyways, so him going makes no difference to our chances in Europe.
  16. You would also get Digne amortisation off the books, not just his wages. So you saving annually 6.5m + 5m, even if you sell for no profit.
  17. It's very different and quite simple. Your squad cost is allowed to be 80% of your revenue (this season, next season drops to 70%). Squad cost is sum of playing and coaching staff salaried plus amortisation. This is divided by your revenue with added profit on player sales (averaged over last 3 years.) So as our revenue is about £200m and average profit on player sales is about £40m, we can spend on wages and amortisation upto 80% of £240m, all ball park figures.
  18. Correct. So Premier League ffp is not a limiting factor atm, but as we qualified for Europe now, we are also subject to the new UEFA squad cost control rules, which are very strict in comparison.
  19. We are not a top team in terms of wages though and we never will be. In our wage structure he is one of the top 3 earners and I would expect him to perform like that. Not just to be a bit part player like some people here are suggesting. If he can't deliver that (due to injuries or whatever else), we need to try to get rid of him.
  20. You can't play a part if you're constantly on the treatment table like he was for last 5 years. Let it go, he's not coming back.
  21. He signed 1 year deal with them...So essentially it is a loan but put through as a transfer so not to take up one of their loan slots. Apart from his wages off the wagebill I wouldn't think we getting a penny for him. Still, it's good we managed to offload him, what a disastrous transfer that was.
  22. The last paragraph would suggest that we are done with major signings. Now time for outgoings, and maybe incoming only if an opportunity hard to pass arises.
  23. Looks like he will never be fit again.
  24. Net spent is such a meaningless figure, you shouldn't be using it. Kamara and Tielemans - net spent zero
×
×
  • Create New...
Â