Czarnikjak
-
Posts
647 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Downloads
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Store
Events
Everything posted by Czarnikjak
-
I don't know. Perhaps they have some agreement with UEFA to provide them with high level figures for all clubs. Our accounts would have been signed off for a while now as we had to share them with premier league and uefa for FFP calculations. Anyway £214m is good...I was expecting something much closer to £200m
-
Latest Deloitte Money League has our revenue for last season at £214m. I wonder how they know, our accounts have not been published yet, unless they have early access…
-
How the hell they managed to increase the Match day revenue by £10m without ticket price increase? Their hospitality/corporate must be well ahead of ours if they can essentially generate double the match day revenue of ours with only extra 10k seats...
-
Talking about increasing revenue, look at just published Newcastle figures for last season (that's before they got any CL money). £70m revenue increase....this train is departing quickly and we ain't catching it.
-
No, all sources I've seen agree on £3m per year. Perhaps £10m in total for 3 years. From Adidas more realistic would be around £10m going upto £15m if we qualify for CL. No chance in hell we will getting anywhere near £30m. Spurs are getting £30m currently after years of qualifying for Europe and much larger world wide following than us.
-
Our Castore deal worth £3m per year is pretty decent if you compare it to mere £90m Adidas pays Man Utd every year not sure why we would want to change
-
No. About 20mil is the maximum.
-
NSWE pumped in another £130m into the club in December. So looks like we are still not sustainable without cash injections. The price to compete at the top is high!
-
Last time we tried to calculate our ratio here it was around 80-90%, but this is with high degree of uncertainty. Yes, player sale profits also count, last 3 year average of your player sales goes towards the cap calculation. Grealish sale just dropping off that calculation was probably the main reason for selling Archer and Ramsey. Swiss Ramble is an authoritive source for me, you can take anything he writes is factually correct.
-
We are not constrained by Premier League P&S that much. Bigger problem is UEFA salary cap, we are constrained by that now as we play in Europe. Having said that, I would expect focus in January to be selling people like Chambers and Traore (if possible at all), and reassessing in the summer when we know which competition we will be playing next season.
-
Last released figures were £178m. Around March figures for last season will be released. Will struggle to hit £200m for that period (obv I'm not counting player sales). We gonna get around £14m boost for higher league placement, few extra bob for higher ticket prices, there was no major new commercial deals last season...all in all, maybe we will scrape £200m but i doubt it.
-
Essentially yes (although I'm pretty sure once the actual work gets the green light and goes ahead you can recapitalise previous expenses and essentially "claim it back" from profit and loss perspective). In Everton case costs prior to June 2021 were expensed on the profit&loss account, I think that was the time when they were given the green light to go ahead with the build. If you're interested in Everton finances this Blog has you covered https://theesk.org/2022/05/30/evertons-financial-position-entering-the-summer/
-
They could, but only after they received build permit you can start capitalising these costs. Any preliminary work before you get the the neccasary permits was counted towards ffp.
-
Maybe they are low because they DO press high, not giving opposition even the chance to get caught offside. We don't press high and thus encourage long balls over compressed middle of the pitch. Risky strategy playing high line without press.
-
Gerrard had no clue what he was doing and Purslow had massive ego. Both paid the price for their poor judgement, unfortunately it did cost us a lot of dough.
- 9,747 replies
-
- 2
-
-
-
- aston villa
- loan out
- (and 1 more)
-
Yup, even if it's just the salary off our books it's still worth it, as it looks like that was the best offer we got for him. Still better than paying him £135k every week.
- 9,747 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- aston villa
- loan out
- (and 1 more)
-
He could be a good company to other injured players in the treatment room.
- 9,747 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- aston villa
- loan out
- (and 1 more)
-
Lol, you would rather keep him so he can spend another year on the treatment table while we pay £7m for this privilege?
- 9,747 replies
-
- 4
-
-
- aston villa
- loan out
- (and 1 more)
-
Saudis or Qatari would buy anyone with only a passing resemblance to a footbal player...not sure Monchi deserves much credit for this one.
-
Barcelona signed Coutinho for a reason too. I don't think the fact that Barcelona signed someone 5 years ago has any relevance to their current usefulness for Villa.
-
So far the only idea Chris Heck shown is to flog fans via Terrace View...lets judge him by his actions not reputation from previous clubs.
-
We don't need replacement for the treatment table place, and if you talking about pitch he never is never fit Anyway
-
He is never available to play anyways, so him going makes no difference to our chances in Europe.
- 9,747 replies
-
- 4
-
-
- aston villa
- loan out
- (and 1 more)
-
You would also get Digne amortisation off the books, not just his wages. So you saving annually 6.5m + 5m, even if you sell for no profit.
-
It's very different and quite simple. Your squad cost is allowed to be 80% of your revenue (this season, next season drops to 70%). Squad cost is sum of playing and coaching staff salaried plus amortisation. This is divided by your revenue with added profit on player sales (averaged over last 3 years.) So as our revenue is about £200m and average profit on player sales is about £40m, we can spend on wages and amortisation upto 80% of £240m, all ball park figures.
